NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 140 OEM

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro M2000M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 140 OEM videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M2000M

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 8 month(s) later
  • Around 58% higher core clock speed: 1029 MHz vs 650 MHz
  • 2.1x more texture fill rate: 43.92 GTexel / s vs 20.8 GTexel / s
  • 10x more pipelines: 640 vs 64
  • 6.8x better floating-point performance: 1,405 gflops vs 208 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 55 nm
  • Around 91% lower typical power consumption: 55 Watt vs 105 Watt
  • 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
  • 2.8x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 1800 MHz
  • 5.3x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3466 vs 658
  • Around 51% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 340 vs 225
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 3 December 2015 vs 10 March 2009
Core clock speed 1029 MHz vs 650 MHz
Texture fill rate 43.92 GTexel / s vs 20.8 GTexel / s
Pipelines 640 vs 64
Floating-point performance 1,405 gflops vs 208 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm vs 55 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 55 Watt vs 105 Watt
Maximum memory size 4 GB vs 1 GB
Memory clock speed 5012 MHz vs 1800 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 3466 vs 658
PassMark - G2D Mark 340 vs 225

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 140 OEM

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
3466
658
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
340
225
Name NVIDIA Quadro M2000M NVIDIA GeForce GT 140 OEM
PassMark - G3D Mark 3466 658
PassMark - G2D Mark 340 225
Geekbench - OpenCL 8148
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 47.281
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 782.113
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 3.5
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 51.048
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 171.268
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 4920
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3355
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 4920
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3355

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA Quadro M2000M NVIDIA GeForce GT 140 OEM

Essentials

Architecture Maxwell Tesla
Code name GM107 G94B
Launch date 3 December 2015 10 March 2009
Place in performance rating 702 699
Type Mobile workstation Desktop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1098 MHz
Core clock speed 1029 MHz 650 MHz
Floating-point performance 1,405 gflops 208 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 55 nm
Pipelines 640 64
Texture fill rate 43.92 GTexel / s 20.8 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 55 Watt 105 Watt
Transistor count 1,870 million 505 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 2x DVI, 1x S-Video
Display Port 1.2

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface MXM-A (3.0) PCIe 2.0 x16
Laptop size large
Supplementary power connectors None 1x 6-pin
Length 229 mm

API support

DirectX 12 10.0
OpenGL 4.5 3.3
Shader Model 5.0
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 1 GB
Memory bandwidth 80 GB / s 57.6 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit 256 Bit
Memory clock speed 5012 MHz 1800 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR3
Shared memory 0

Technologies

3D Vision Pro
Mosaic
nView Display Management
Optimus