NVIDIA Quadro M500M vs ATI FireMV 2200 PCI
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro M500M and ATI FireMV 2200 PCI videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro M500M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 10 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- 4.3x more core clock speed: 1029 MHz vs 240 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 150 nm
- 32x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 64 MB
- 4.5x more memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 400 MHz
- 1163x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1163 vs 1
- Around 18% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 180 vs 153
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 27 April 2016 vs 1 January 2006 |
Core clock speed | 1029 MHz vs 240 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 150 nm |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 64 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 400 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1163 vs 1 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 180 vs 153 |
Reasons to consider the ATI FireMV 2200 PCI
- 53.4x more texture fill rate: 960 MTexel / s vs 17.98 GTexel / s
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 30 Watt
Texture fill rate | 960 MTexel / s vs 17.98 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 30 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro M500M
GPU 2: ATI FireMV 2200 PCI
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro M500M | ATI FireMV 2200 PCI |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1163 | 1 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 180 | 153 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6069 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2174 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2174 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1729 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1729 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3122 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3122 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro M500M | ATI FireMV 2200 PCI | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | Rage 7 |
Code name | GM108 | RV280 |
Launch date | 27 April 2016 | 1 January 2006 |
Place in performance rating | 1093 | 1090 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1124 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1029 MHz | 240 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 863.2 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 150 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | |
Texture fill rate | 17.98 GTexel / s | 960 MTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 15 Watt |
Transistor count | 36 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DMS-59 |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCI |
Laptop size | large | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Length | 170 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 8.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 1.4 |
Shader Model | 5.0 | |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 64 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 3.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 400 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR3 | DDR |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
nView Display Management | ||
Optimus |