NVIDIA Quadro NVS 120M vs NVIDIA GeForce FX 5950 Ultra
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro NVS 120M and NVIDIA GeForce FX 5950 Ultra videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro NVS 120M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 90 nm vs 130 nm
- 7.4x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 74 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 512 MB vs 256 MB
- Around 47% higher memory clock speed: 1400 MHz vs 950 MHz
Launch date | 1 June 2006 vs 23 October 2003 |
Manufacturing process technology | 90 nm vs 130 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt vs 74 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 512 MB vs 256 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1400 MHz vs 950 MHz |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce FX 5950 Ultra
- Around 6% higher core clock speed: 475 MHz vs 450 MHz
- Around 6% higher texture fill rate: 1.9 GTexel / s vs 1.8 GTexel / s
- Around 26% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 59 vs 47
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 475 MHz vs 450 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 1.9 GTexel / s vs 1.8 GTexel / s |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 59 vs 47 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro NVS 120M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce FX 5950 Ultra
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro NVS 120M | NVIDIA GeForce FX 5950 Ultra |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 47 | 59 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 274 | 274 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 120M | NVIDIA GeForce FX 5950 Ultra | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Curie | Rankine |
Code name | G72 | NV38 A1 |
Launch date | 1 June 2006 | 23 October 2003 |
Place in performance rating | 612 | 615 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $499 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 450 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 450 MHz | 475 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 90 nm | 130 nm |
Pipelines | 4 | |
Texture fill rate | 1.8 GTexel / s | 1.9 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt | 74 Watt |
Transistor count | 112 million | 135 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-III | AGP 8x |
Length | 229 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x Molex | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 9.0c | 9.0a |
OpenGL | 2.1 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 256 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 11.2 GB / s | 30.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 700 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1400 MHz | 950 MHz |
Memory type | 64 | DDR |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
CineFX 4.0 | ||
Intellisample 4.0 | ||
PowerMizer 6.0 | ||
UltraShadow II |