NVIDIA GeForce 8800 Ultra vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 120M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce 8800 Ultra and NVIDIA Quadro NVS 120M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 8800 Ultra
- Videocard is newer: launch date 11 month(s) later
- Around 36% higher core clock speed: 612 MHz vs 450 MHz
- 21.8x more texture fill rate: 39.2 billion / sec vs 1.8 GTexel / s
- 32x more pipelines: 128 vs 4
- 13.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 643 vs 47
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 2 May 2007 vs 1 June 2006 |
Core clock speed | 612 MHz vs 450 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 39.2 billion / sec vs 1.8 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 128 vs 4 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 643 vs 47 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro NVS 120M
- 17.1x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 171 Watt
- Around 30% higher memory clock speed: 1400 MHz vs 1080 MHz
- Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 274 vs 252
Specifications (specs) | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt vs 171 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1400 MHz vs 1080 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 274 vs 252 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 8800 Ultra
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro NVS 120M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce 8800 Ultra | NVIDIA Quadro NVS 120M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 643 | 47 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 252 | 274 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 Ultra | NVIDIA Quadro NVS 120M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla | Curie |
Code name | G80 | G72 |
Launch date | 2 May 2007 | 1 June 2006 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $829 | |
Place in performance rating | 617 | 620 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 612 MHz | 450 MHz |
CUDA cores | 612 | |
Floating-point performance | 387.1 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 90 nm | 90 nm |
Pipelines | 128 | 4 |
Texture fill rate | 39.2 billion / sec | 1.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 171 Watt | 10 Watt |
Transistor count | 681 million | 112 million |
Boost clock speed | 450 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | MXM-III |
Length | 270 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 9.0c |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 103.7 GB / s | 11.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 700 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1080 MHz | 1400 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR3 | 64 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
SLI | ||
CineFX 4.0 | ||
Intellisample 4.0 | ||
PowerMizer 6.0 | ||
UltraShadow II |