NVIDIA Quadro NVS 280 PCIe vs ATI Radeon X800 PRO AGP
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro NVS 280 PCIe and ATI Radeon X800 PRO AGP videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro NVS 280 PCIe
- 3.7x lower typical power consumption: 13 Watt vs 48 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 13 Watt vs 48 Watt |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon X800 PRO AGP
- Around 73% higher core clock speed: 475 MHz vs 275 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 130 nm vs 150 nm
- Around 80% higher memory clock speed: 900 MHz vs 500 MHz
Core clock speed | 475 MHz vs 275 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 130 nm vs 150 nm |
Memory clock speed | 900 MHz vs 500 MHz |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 280 PCIe | ATI Radeon X800 PRO AGP | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Rankine | R400 |
Code name | NV37 | R420 |
Launch date | 25 May 2004 | 1 May 2004 |
Place in performance rating | not rated | not rated |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 275 MHz | 475 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 150 nm | 130 nm |
Texture fill rate | 1.1 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 13 Watt | 48 Watt |
Transistor count | 45 million | 160 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DMS-59 | 1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | AGP 8x |
Length | 168 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x Molex |
API support |
||
DirectX | 9.0a | 9.0b |
OpenGL | 1.5 (2.1) | 2.0 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 64 MB | |
Memory bandwidth | 8 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 500 MHz | 900 MHz |
Memory type | DDR |