NVIDIA Quadro NVS 50 PCI vs Intel GMA 950
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro NVS 50 PCI and Intel GMA 950 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro NVS 50 PCI
- Videocard is newer: launch date 0 month(s) later
- Around 51% higher core clock speed: 250 MHz vs 166 MHz
| Launch date | 31 May 2005 vs 1 May 2005 |
| Core clock speed | 250 MHz vs 166 MHz |
Reasons to consider the Intel GMA 950
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 90 nm vs 150 nm
- Around 43% lower typical power consumption: 7 Watt vs 10 Watt
| Manufacturing process technology | 90 nm vs 150 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 7 Watt vs 10 Watt |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro NVS 50 PCI | Intel GMA 950 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Celsius | Generation 3.5 |
| Code name | NV18 A4 | Lakeport |
| Launch date | 31 May 2005 | 1 May 2005 |
| Place in performance rating | not rated | not rated |
| Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 250 MHz | 166 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 150 nm | 90 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 1 GTexel / s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt | 7 Watt |
| Transistor count | 29 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x S-Video | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCI | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Length | 168 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 8.0 | 9.0c |
| OpenGL | 1.3 | 2.0 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 64 MB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 1.6 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 32 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 400 MHz | |
| Memory type | DDR | |
