NVIDIA Quadro NVS 510M vs ATI FireGL V7300
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro NVS 510M and ATI FireGL V7300 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro NVS 510M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 10 month(s) later
- Around 14% higher texture fill rate: 10.8 GTexel / s vs 9.5 GTexel / s
- 2.8x lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 97 Watt
- Around 98% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 254 vs 128
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 21 August 2006 vs 1 October 2005 |
Texture fill rate | 10.8 GTexel / s vs 9.5 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt vs 97 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 254 vs 128 |
Reasons to consider the ATI FireGL V7300
- Around 32% higher core clock speed: 594 MHz vs 450 MHz
- 2x more maximum memory size: 512 MB vs 256 MB
- Around 8% higher memory clock speed: 1296 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- Around 2% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 322 vs 317
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 594 MHz vs 450 MHz |
Maximum memory size | 512 MB vs 256 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1296 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 322 vs 317 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro NVS 510M
GPU 2: ATI FireGL V7300
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro NVS 510M | ATI FireGL V7300 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 317 | 322 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 254 | 128 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 510M | ATI FireGL V7300 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Curie | R500 |
Code name | G71 | R520 |
Launch date | 21 August 2006 | 1 October 2005 |
Place in performance rating | 498 | 500 |
Type | Workstation | Workstation |
Launch price (MSRP) | $1,599 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 450 MHz | 594 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 90 nm | 90 nm |
Texture fill rate | 10.8 GTexel / s | 9.5 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 97 Watt |
Transistor count | 278 million | 321 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Length | 229 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 9.0c | 9.0c |
OpenGL | 2.1 | 2.0 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 256 MB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 19.2 GB / s | 41.5 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1200 MHz | 1296 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR3 |