NVIDIA Quadro P400 vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4225 IGP
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P400 and ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4225 IGP videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P400
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- 3.2x more core clock speed: 1228 MHz vs 380 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 55 nm
- 24.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1641 vs 66
- 2.6x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 444 vs 174
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 7 February 2017 vs 1 May 2010 |
Core clock speed | 1228 MHz vs 380 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 55 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1641 vs 66 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 444 vs 174 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4225 IGP
- 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 9 Watt vs 30 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 9 Watt vs 30 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P400
GPU 2: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4225 IGP
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro P400 | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4225 IGP |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1641 | 66 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 444 | 174 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3053 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 20.138 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 318.72 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.391 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.886 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 84.858 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2709 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2875 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3328 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2709 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2875 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3328 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 617 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro P400 | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4225 IGP | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | TeraScale |
Code name | GP107 | RS880 |
Launch date | 7 February 2017 | 1 May 2010 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $119.99 | |
Place in performance rating | 982 | 979 |
Price now | $119.99 | |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Value for money (0-100) | 18.70 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1252 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1228 MHz | 380 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 679.9 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 55 nm |
Pipelines | 256 | |
Texture fill rate | 21.25 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 9 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,300 million | 181 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 3x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Length | 145 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 32.1 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 4012 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 |