NVIDIA Quadro P400 vs AMD Radeon R9 M275

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P400 and AMD Radeon R9 M275 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P400

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 0 month(s) later
• Around 36% higher core clock speed: 1228 MHz vs 900 MHz
• Around 35% higher boost clock speed: 1252 MHz vs 925 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• Around 48% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1649 vs 1115
• 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2875 vs 1162
• Around 94% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3328 vs 1717
• 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2875 vs 1162
• Around 94% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3328 vs 1717

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 M275

• Around 74% higher texture fill rate: 37 GTexel / s vs 21.25 GTexel / s
• 2.5x more pipelines: 640 vs 256
• Around 74% better floating-point performance: 1,184 gflops vs 679.9 gflops
• Around 30% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 569 vs 439
• 3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9231 vs 3053
• Around 41% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 28.064 vs 19.856
• Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 313.463 vs 309.824
• Around 60% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.206 vs 1.38
• Around 37% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 34.381 vs 25.011
• Around 44% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 121.685 vs 84.489

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P400
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 M275

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1649 1115
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	439 569
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	3053 9231
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	19.856 28.064
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	309.824 313.463
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.38 2.206
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	25.011 34.381
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	84.489 121.685
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2875 1162
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3328 1717
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2875 1162
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3328 1717

Compare specifications (specs)