NVIDIA Quadro P400 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P400 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P400

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 7 month(s) later
• Around 25% higher core clock speed: 1228 MHz vs 980 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
• Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 50 Watt
• Around 35% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 439 vs 325
• Around 59% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 19.856 vs 12.449
• Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.38 vs 1.295
• Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 25.011 vs 24.566
• 3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 84.489 vs 28.025

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M

• Around 48% higher texture fill rate: 31.36 GTexel / s vs 21.25 GTexel / s
• Around 50% higher pipelines: 384 vs 256
• Around 11% better floating-point performance: 752.6 gflops vs 679.9 gflops
• Around 35% higher memory clock speed: 5400 MHz vs 4012 MHz
• Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1695 vs 1649
• Around 62% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4933 vs 3053
• Around 47% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 455.796 vs 309.824
• Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3093 vs 2709
• Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3504 vs 2875
• Around 14% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3093 vs 2709
• Around 22% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3504 vs 2875
• 3.5x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2148 vs 617

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P400
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1649 1695
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	439 325
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	3053 4933
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	19.856 12.449
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	309.824 455.796
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.38 1.295
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	25.011 24.566
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	84.489 28.025
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2709 3093
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2875 3504
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3328 3344
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2709 3093
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2875 3504
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3328 3344
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	617 2148

Compare specifications (specs)