NVIDIA Quadro P4200 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P4200 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P4200 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 month(s) later
- Around 1% higher texture fill rate: 137.4 GTexel / s vs 136.7 GTexel / s
- Around 40% higher pipelines: 1792 vs 1280
- Around 1% better floating-point performance: 4,398 gflops vs 4,375 gflops
- Around 20% lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 120 Watt
- Around 60% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 5 GB
- Around 18% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 10729 vs 9092
- Around 10% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 38732 vs 35063
- Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16345 vs 10818
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3714 vs 3417
- Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16345 vs 10818
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3714 vs 3417
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 21 February 2018 vs 26 December 2017 |
Texture fill rate | 137.4 GTexel / s vs 136.7 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1792 vs 1280 |
Floating-point performance | 4,398 gflops vs 4,375 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt vs 120 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 5 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 10729 vs 9092 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 38732 vs 35063 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16345 vs 10818 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 vs 3417 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16345 vs 10818 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 vs 3417 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB
- Around 23% higher core clock speed: 1506 MHz vs 1227 MHz
- Around 4% higher boost clock speed: 1709 MHz vs 1647 MHz
- Around 33% higher memory clock speed: 8008 MHz vs 6008 MHz
- Around 27% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 619 vs 488
- 32.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 103
- 32.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 103
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1506 MHz vs 1227 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1709 MHz vs 1647 MHz |
Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz vs 6008 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 619 vs 488 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 103 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 103 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P4200 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro P4200 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 10729 | 9092 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 488 | 619 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 38732 | 35063 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16345 | 10818 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 3417 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 103 | 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16345 | 10818 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 3417 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 103 | 3358 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | 3917 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro P4200 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Pascal |
Code name | GP104 | GP106 |
Launch date | 21 February 2018 | 26 December 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 299 | 303 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1647 MHz | 1709 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1227 MHz | 1506 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 4,398 gflops | 4,375 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 16 nm |
Pipelines | 1792 | 1280 |
Texture fill rate | 137.4 GTexel / s | 136.7 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 120 Watt |
Transistor count | 7,200 million | 4,400 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 250 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 5 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 192.3 GB / s | 160.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 160 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz | 8008 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |