NVIDIA Quadro P4200 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P4200 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P4200 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 150 Watt
- 751x more memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 8 GB/s
- Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 10729 vs 10465
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 16345 vs 13765
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3714 vs 3691
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 16345 vs 13765
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3714 vs 3691
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 21 February 2018 vs 15 August 2016 |
Boost clock speed | 1647 MHz vs 1645 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt vs 150 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz vs 8 GB/s |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 10729 vs 10465 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16345 vs 13765 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 vs 3691 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16345 vs 13765 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 vs 3691 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
- Around 23% higher core clock speed: 1506 MHz vs 1227 MHz
- Around 53% higher texture fill rate: 210.6 GTexel / s vs 137.4 GTexel / s
- Around 14% higher pipelines: 2048 vs 1792
- Around 53% better floating-point performance: 6,738 gflops vs 4,398 gflops
- Around 24% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 603 vs 488
- Around 24% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 47422 vs 38375
- 32.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3340 vs 103
- 32.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3340 vs 103
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1506 MHz vs 1227 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 210.6 GTexel / s vs 137.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2048 vs 1792 |
Floating-point performance | 6,738 gflops vs 4,398 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 603 vs 488 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 47422 vs 38375 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 vs 103 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 vs 103 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P4200 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro P4200 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop) |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 10729 | 10465 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 488 | 603 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 38375 | 47422 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16345 | 13765 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 3691 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 103 | 3340 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16345 | 13765 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 3691 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 103 | 3340 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | 5536 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 150.951 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1718.593 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 12.283 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 28.289 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 710.366 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro P4200 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Pascal |
Code name | GP104 | GP104B |
Launch date | 21 February 2018 | 15 August 2016 |
Place in performance rating | 298 | 296 |
Type | Mobile workstation | Laptop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $389.99 | |
Price now | $359.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 43.18 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1647 MHz | 1645 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1227 MHz | 1506 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 4,398 gflops | 6,738 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 16 nm |
Pipelines | 1792 | 2048 |
Texture fill rate | 137.4 GTexel / s | 210.6 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 150 Watt |
Transistor count | 7,200 million | 7,200 million |
CUDA cores | 1920 | |
Maximum GPU temperature | 94 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | DP 1.42, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI |
G-SYNC support | ||
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 192.3 GB / s | 256 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz | 8 GB/s |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
ShadowWorks | ||
SLI | ||
Virtual Reality | ||
VR Ready |