NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Max-Q vs AMD Radeon HD 7690M XT
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Max-Q and AMD Radeon HD 7690M XT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, API support, Memory, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 82% higher core clock speed: 1316 MHz vs 725 MHz
- 14425.3x more texture fill rate: 251.0 GTexel/s vs 17.4 GTexel / s
- 5.3x more pipelines: 2560 vs 480
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 40 nm
- 8x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 2 GB
- 6.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 53854 vs 8800
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 21 February 2018 vs 7 January 2013 |
Core clock speed | 1316 MHz vs 725 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 251.0 GTexel/s vs 17.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2560 vs 480 |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm vs 40 nm |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 2 GB |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 53854 vs 8800 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 7690M XT
- 4x lower typical power consumption: 25 Watt vs 100 Watt
- 2x more memory clock speed: 3600 MHz vs 1804 MHz (7216 MHz effective)
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 25 Watt vs 100 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz vs 1804 MHz (7216 MHz effective) |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Max-Q
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 7690M XT
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Max-Q | AMD Radeon HD 7690M XT |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 53854 | 8800 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1009 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 552 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Max-Q | AMD Radeon HD 7690M XT | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Terascale 2 |
Code name | GP104 | Thames |
Launch date | 21 February 2018 | 7 January 2013 |
Place in performance rating | 395 | 392 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1569 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1316 MHz | 725 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 40 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 251.0 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 125.5 GFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 8.033 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2560 | 480 |
Pixel fill rate | 100.4 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 251.0 GTexel/s | 17.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 25 Watt |
Transistor count | 7200 million | 716 million |
Floating-point performance | 696.0 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 | 11 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 230.9 GB/s | 57.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 256 bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1804 MHz (7216 MHz effective) | 3600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
Laptop size | medium sized |