NVIDIA Quadro T1000 vs NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Max-Q
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro T1000 and NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T1000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 6% higher core clock speed: 1395 MHz vs 1316 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 100 Watt
- 4.4x more memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 1804 MHz (7216 MHz effective)
Launch date | 27 May 2019 vs 21 February 2018 |
Core clock speed | 1395 MHz vs 1316 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 16 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 100 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz vs 1804 MHz (7216 MHz effective) |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Max-Q
- Around 8% higher boost clock speed: 1569 MHz vs 1455 MHz
- 3.6x more texture fill rate: 251.0 GTexel/s vs 69.84 GTexel/s
- 3.3x more pipelines: 2560 vs 768
- 4x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 63% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 53854 vs 32981
Specifications (specs) | |
Boost clock speed | 1569 MHz vs 1455 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 251.0 GTexel/s vs 69.84 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 2560 vs 768 |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 4 GB |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 53854 vs 32981 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T1000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Max-Q
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro T1000 | NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Max-Q |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6466 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 416 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 32981 | 53854 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 87.83 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9009 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9009 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 | NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Max-Q | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
Code name | TU117 | GP104 |
Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 21 February 2018 |
Place in performance rating | 398 | 399 |
Type | Mobile Workstation | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1455 MHz | 1569 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1395 MHz | 1316 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 16 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 69.84 GFLOPS | 251.0 GFLOPS |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 4.470 TFLOPS | 125.5 GFLOPS |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 2.235 TFLOPS | 8.033 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 768 | 2560 |
Pixel fill rate | 46.56 GPixel/s | 100.4 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 69.84 GTexel/s | 251.0 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 100 Watt |
Transistor count | 4700 million | 7200 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | 6.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 16 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 128 GB/s | 230.9 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 256 bit |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 1804 MHz (7216 MHz effective) |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |