NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q vs NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Max-Q
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q and NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 3% higher boost clock speed: 1620 MHz vs 1569 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
- 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 40 Watt vs 100 Watt
- Around 11% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz (8000 MHz effective) vs 1804 MHz (7216 MHz effective)
Launch date | 27 May 2019 vs 21 February 2018 |
Boost clock speed | 1620 MHz vs 1569 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 16 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt vs 100 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (8000 MHz effective) vs 1804 MHz (7216 MHz effective) |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Max-Q
- Around 10% higher core clock speed: 1316 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- 2.4x more texture fill rate: 251.0 GTexel/s vs 103.7 GTexel/s
- 2.5x more pipelines: 2560 vs 1024
- 4x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 30% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 53806 vs 41260
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1316 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 251.0 GTexel/s vs 103.7 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 2560 vs 1024 |
Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 4 GB |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 53806 vs 41260 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Max-Q
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q | NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Max-Q |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7682 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7682 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3703 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3703 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 41260 | 53806 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 413 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6899 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q | NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Max-Q | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
Code name | TU117 | GP104 |
Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 21 February 2018 |
Place in performance rating | 402 | 403 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1620 MHz | 1569 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1200 MHz | 1316 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 16 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 103.7 GFLOPS (1:32) | 251.0 GFLOPS |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 6.636 TFLOPS (2:1) | 125.5 GFLOPS |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.318 TFLOPS | 8.033 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 1024 | 2560 |
Pixel fill rate | 51.84 GPixel/s | 100.4 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 103.7 GTexel/s | 251.0 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt | 100 Watt |
Transistor count | 4700 million | 7200 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Width | IGP | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.4 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 16 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 128.0 GB/s | 230.9 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 256 bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (8000 MHz effective) | 1804 MHz (7216 MHz effective) |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |