NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q vs NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Max-Q
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q and NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 3% higher boost clock speed: 1620 MHz vs 1569 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
- 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 40 Watt vs 100 Watt
- Around 11% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz (8000 MHz effective) vs 1804 MHz (7216 MHz effective)
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 vs 21 February 2018 |
| Boost clock speed | 1620 MHz vs 1569 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 16 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt vs 100 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (8000 MHz effective) vs 1804 MHz (7216 MHz effective) |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Max-Q
- Around 10% higher core clock speed: 1316 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- 2.4x more texture fill rate: 251.0 GTexel/s vs 103.7 GTexel/s
- 2.5x more pipelines: 2560 vs 1024
- 4x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 31% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 53809 vs 41046
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1316 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 251.0 GTexel/s vs 103.7 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 2560 vs 1024 |
| Maximum memory size | 16 GB vs 4 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 53809 vs 41046 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Max-Q
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q | NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7682 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7682 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3703 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3703 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 41046 | 53809 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 405 | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6871 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max-Q | NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Max-Q | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
| Code name | TU117 | GP104 |
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 21 February 2018 |
| Place in performance rating | 395 | 396 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1620 MHz | 1569 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1200 MHz | 1316 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 16 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 103.7 GFLOPS (1:32) | 251.0 GFLOPS |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 6.636 TFLOPS (2:1) | 125.5 GFLOPS |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 3.318 TFLOPS | 8.033 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 1024 | 2560 |
| Pixel fill rate | 51.84 GPixel/s | 100.4 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 103.7 GTexel/s | 251.0 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Transistor count | 4700 million | 7200 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Width | IGP | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.4 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 16 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 128.0 GB/s | 230.9 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 256 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (8000 MHz effective) | 1804 MHz (7216 MHz effective) |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |

