NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 vs NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Jedi Order
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 and NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Jedi Order videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
- Around 15% higher core clock speed: 1620 MHz vs 1405 MHz
- Around 15% higher boost clock speed: 1815 MHz vs 1582 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
- Around 25% lower typical power consumption: 200 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 23% higher memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 11408 MHz
- Around 47% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 98384 vs 66942
- Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19800 vs 16138
- Around 23% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19800 vs 16138
- Around 5% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 10642 vs 10103
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 13 August 2018 vs 4 November 2017 |
Core clock speed | 1620 MHz vs 1405 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1815 MHz vs 1582 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 16 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 200 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 11408 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 98384 vs 66942 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19800 vs 16138 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19800 vs 16138 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10642 vs 10103 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Jedi Order
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 vs 3702 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 vs 3347 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 vs 3702 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 vs 3347 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000
GPU 2: NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Jedi Order
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 | NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Jedi Order |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 16793 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 810 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 98384 | 66942 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19800 | 16138 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3702 | 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3347 | 3355 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19800 | 16138 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3702 | 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3347 | 3355 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10642 | 10103 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 296.223 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4303.239 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 23.759 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 163.551 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1382.954 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 | NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Jedi Order | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
Code name | TU104 | GP102 |
Launch date | 13 August 2018 | 4 November 2017 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $2,299 | $1,199 |
Place in performance rating | 43 | 56 |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1815 MHz | 1582 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1620 MHz | 1405 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 16 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 200 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 13,600 million | 11,800 million |
Floating-point performance | 12,150 gflops | |
Pipelines | 3840 | |
Texture fill rate | 379.7 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | 267 mm |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 11408 MHz |
Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 547.6 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | |
Memory type | GDDR5X |