NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
- Around 33% lower typical power consumption: 150 Watt vs 200 Watt
- Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 297.996 vs 270.203
- Around 47% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 162.692 vs 110.761
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8905 vs 3719
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8060 vs 3358
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8905 vs 3719
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8060 vs 3358
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 29 January 2019 vs 13 August 2018 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt vs 200 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 297.996 vs 270.203 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 162.692 vs 110.761 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8905 vs 3719 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8060 vs 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8905 vs 3719 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8060 vs 3358 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000
- 2.2x more core clock speed: 1620 MHz vs 735 MHz
- Around 66% higher boost clock speed: 1815 MHz vs 1095 MHz
- Around 17% higher memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 12000 MHz
- Around 21% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 15652 vs 12935
- Around 36% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 705 vs 519
- Around 25% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 105171 vs 84332
- Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3728.248 vs 3676.805
- Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 26.999 vs 22.75
- Around 23% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1370.281 vs 1116.69
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19811 vs 19139
- Around 4% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19811 vs 19139
- Around 37% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 10685 vs 7784
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1620 MHz vs 735 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1815 MHz vs 1095 MHz |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 12000 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 15652 vs 12935 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 705 vs 519 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 105171 vs 84332 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3728.248 vs 3676.805 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 26.999 vs 22.75 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1370.281 vs 1116.69 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19811 vs 19139 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19811 vs 19139 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10685 vs 7784 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 12935 | 15652 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 519 | 705 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 84332 | 105171 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 297.996 | 270.203 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3676.805 | 3728.248 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 22.75 | 26.999 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 162.692 | 110.761 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1116.69 | 1370.281 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19139 | 19811 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8905 | 3719 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8060 | 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19139 | 19811 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8905 | 3719 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8060 | 3358 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7784 | 10685 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Code name | TU104B | TU104 |
| Launch date | 29 January 2019 | 13 August 2018 |
| Place in performance rating | 135 | 138 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $2,299 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1095 MHz | 1815 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 735 MHz | 1620 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Pipelines | 2944 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 200 Watt |
| Transistor count | 13,600 million | 13,600 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 12000 MHz | 14000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | |
