NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 versus NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Jedi Order
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 and NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Jedi Order pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 9 mois plus tard
- Environ 15% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1620 MHz versus 1405 MHz
- Environ 15% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1815 MHz versus 1582 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 16 nm
- Environ 25% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 200 Watt versus 250 Watt
- Environ 23% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 14000 MHz versus 11408 MHz
- Environ 61% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 105171 versus 65520
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 26.999 versus 23.759
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19811 versus 16138
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19811 versus 16138
- 4.6x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 10685 versus 2345
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 13 August 2018 versus 4 November 2017 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1620 MHz versus 1405 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1815 MHz versus 1582 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 16 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 200 Watt versus 250 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz versus 11408 MHz |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 105171 versus 65520 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 26.999 versus 23.759 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19811 versus 16138 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 versus 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 versus 3355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19811 versus 16138 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 versus 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 versus 3355 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10685 versus 2345 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Jedi Order
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 296.223 versus 270.203
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4303.239 versus 3728.248
- Environ 48% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 163.551 versus 110.761
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1382.954 versus 1370.281
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 296.223 versus 270.203 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4303.239 versus 3728.248 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 163.551 versus 110.761 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1382.954 versus 1370.281 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000
GPU 2: NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Jedi Order
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 | NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Jedi Order |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 15652 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 705 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 105171 | 65520 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 270.203 | 296.223 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3728.248 | 4303.239 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 26.999 | 23.759 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 110.761 | 163.551 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1370.281 | 1382.954 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19811 | 16138 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3719 | 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19811 | 16138 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3719 | 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3355 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10685 | 2345 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 | NVIDIA TITAN Xp Collector's Edition Jedi Order | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
| Nom de code | TU104 | GP102 |
| Date de sortie | 13 August 2018 | 4 November 2017 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $2,299 | $1,199 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 138 | 213 |
| Genre | Workstation | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1815 MHz | 1582 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1620 MHz | 1405 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 16 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 200 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 13,600 million | 11,800 million |
| Performance á point flottant | 12,150 gflops | |
| Pipelines | 3840 | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 379.7 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 267 mm | 267 mm |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
| Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz | 11408 MHz |
| RAM maximale | 12 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 547.6 GB / s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 384 Bit | |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5X | |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 avec des autres
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3080 Max-Q
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 vs
NVIDIAT1000 8 GB
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 vs
AMDRadeon RX 7600M XT
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 vs
AMDRadeon PRO W6300
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 5000 vs
NVIDIARTX 1000 Mobile Ada Generation
