NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 vs NVIDIA Tesla P100 SXM2
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 and NVIDIA Tesla P100 SXM2 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 8% higher core clock speed: 1440 MHz vs 1328 MHz
- Around 20% higher boost clock speed: 1770 MHz vs 1480 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
- Around 20% lower typical power consumption: 250 Watt vs 300 Watt
- 9.9x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1408 MHz
| Launch date | 13 August 2018 vs 5 April 2016 |
| Core clock speed | 1440 MHz vs 1328 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1770 MHz vs 1480 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 16 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt vs 300 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 1408 MHz |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla P100 SXM2
- Around 3% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 76222 vs 74179
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 76222 vs 74179 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla P100 SXM2
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 | NVIDIA Tesla P100 SXM2 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 18544 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 785 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 74179 | 76222 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 488.989 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5451.006 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 41.461 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 153.677 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1534.582 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19571 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19571 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3503 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 | NVIDIA Tesla P100 SXM2 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
| Code name | TU102 | GP100 |
| Launch date | 13 August 2018 | 5 April 2016 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $6,299 | |
| Place in performance rating | 124 | 256 |
| Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1770 MHz | 1480 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1440 MHz | 1328 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 16 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 300 Watt |
| Transistor count | 18,600 million | 15,300 million |
| Floating-point performance | 10,609 gflops | |
| Pipelines | 3584 | |
| Texture fill rate | 331.5 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | None |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 1408 MHz |
| Maximum RAM amount | 16 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 720.9 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 4096 Bit | |
| Memory type | HBM2 | |

