NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
  • 2.2x lower typical power consumption: 115 Watt vs 250 Watt
  • 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8898 vs 3717
  • 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8898 vs 3717
  • 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8029 vs 3357
  • 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8029 vs 3357
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 29 January 2019 vs 13 August 2018
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 115 Watt vs 250 Watt
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 8898 vs 3717
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 8898 vs 3717
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 8029 vs 3357
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 8029 vs 3357

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000

  • Around 19% higher core clock speed: 1440 MHz vs 1215 MHz
  • Around 23% higher boost clock speed: 1770 MHz vs 1440 MHz
  • Around 87% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 13943 vs 7449
  • Around 32% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 791 vs 601
  • Around 53% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 18872 vs 12354
  • Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19571 vs 18604
  • Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19571 vs 18604
Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed 1440 MHz vs 1215 MHz
Boost clock speed 1770 MHz vs 1440 MHz
Benchmarks
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 13943 vs 7449
PassMark - G2D Mark 791 vs 601
PassMark - G3D Mark 18872 vs 12354
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 19571 vs 18604
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 19571 vs 18604

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000

3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score
GPU 1
GPU 2
7449
13943
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
601
791
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
12354
18872
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
18604
19571
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
18604
19571
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
8898
3717
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
8898
3717
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
8029
3357
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
8029
3357
Name NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 7449 13943
PassMark - G2D Mark 601 791
PassMark - G3D Mark 12354 18872
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 18604 19571
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 18604 19571
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 8898 3717
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 8898 3717
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 8029 3357
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 8029 3357
Geekbench - OpenCL 74179
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 488.989
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 5451.006
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 41.461
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 153.677
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 1534.582

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000

Essentials

Architecture Turing Turing
Code name TU106 TU102
Launch date 29 January 2019 13 August 2018
Place in performance rating 128 112
Price now $489.99
Type Laptop Workstation
Value for money (0-100) 49.06
Launch price (MSRP) $6,299

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1440 MHz 1770 MHz
Core clock speed 1215 MHz 1440 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm 12 nm
Pipelines 2304
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 115 Watt 250 Watt
Transistor count 10,800 million 18,600 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Length 267 mm
Supplementary power connectors 2x 8-pin

API support

DirectX 12.0 12.0 (12_1)
OpenGL 4.6 4.6

Memory

Memory bus width 256 Bit
Memory clock speed 14000 MHz 14000 MHz
Memory type GDDR6