NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 month(s) later
- 2.2x lower typical power consumption: 115 Watt vs 250 Watt
- 2.1x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 7393 vs 3503
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8898 vs 3717
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8898 vs 3717
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8029 vs 3357
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8029 vs 3357
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 29 January 2019 vs 13 August 2018 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7393 vs 3503 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8898 vs 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8898 vs 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8029 vs 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8029 vs 3357 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
- Around 19% higher core clock speed: 1440 MHz vs 1215 MHz
- Around 23% higher boost clock speed: 1770 MHz vs 1440 MHz
- Around 31% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 789 vs 601
- Around 51% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 18633 vs 12354
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19571 vs 18604
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19571 vs 18604
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1440 MHz vs 1215 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1770 MHz vs 1440 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 789 vs 601 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 18633 vs 12354 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19571 vs 18604 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19571 vs 18604 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 |
---|---|---|
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7393 | 3503 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 601 | 789 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 12354 | 18633 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 18604 | 19571 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 18604 | 19571 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8898 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8898 | 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8029 | 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8029 | 3357 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 74179 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 488.989 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5451.006 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 41.461 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 153.677 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1534.582 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Turing |
Code name | TU106 | TU102 |
Launch date | 29 January 2019 | 13 August 2018 |
Place in performance rating | 121 | 123 |
Price now | $489.99 | |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Value for money (0-100) | 49.06 | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $6,299 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1440 MHz | 1770 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1215 MHz | 1440 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 12 nm |
Pipelines | 2304 | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 10,800 million | 18,600 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz | 14000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 |