AMD Radeon RX 6700M vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 6700M and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 6700M
- Around 3% higher core clock speed: 1489 MHz vs 1440 MHz
- Around 27% higher boost clock speed: 2250 MHz vs 1770 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 7 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 39% lower typical power consumption: 180 Watt vs 250 Watt
- Around 5% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 78059 vs 74179
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1489 MHz vs 1440 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2250 MHz vs 1770 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm vs 12 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 180 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 78059 vs 74179 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
- 7x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective)
- Around 39% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 789 vs 567
- Around 38% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 18633 vs 13537
- Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19571 vs 16145
- Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19571 vs 16145
- Around 90% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3503 vs 1846
Specifications (specs) | |
Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 789 vs 567 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 18633 vs 13537 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19571 vs 16145 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19571 vs 16145 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3503 vs 1846 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 6700M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 6700M | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 567 | 789 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13537 | 18633 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 78059 | 74179 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 16145 | 19571 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 16145 | 19571 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1846 | 3503 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 488.989 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5451.006 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 41.461 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 153.677 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1534.582 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD Radeon RX 6700M | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | Turing |
Code name | Navi 22 | TU102 |
Place in performance rating | 122 | 123 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Launch date | 13 August 2018 | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $6,299 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2250 MHz | 1770 MHz |
Compute units | 36 | |
Core clock speed | 1489 MHz | 1440 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 12 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 648.0 GFLOPS (1:16) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 20.74 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 10.37 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 2304 | |
Pixel fill rate | 144.0 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 324.0 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 180 Watt | 250 Watt |
Transistor count | 17200 million | 18,600 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 10 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 320 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 160 bit | |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) | 14000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 |