NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Video outputs and ports, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 9 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3716 vs 3654
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3716 vs 3654
- Around 9% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 33747 vs 31098
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 vs 15 August 2016 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 16 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 vs 3654 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 vs 3654 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 33747 vs 31098 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
- Around 22% higher core clock speed: 1506 MHz vs 795 / 1230 MHz
- Around 17% higher boost clock speed: 1708 MHz vs 1455 MHz
- Around 67% higher pipelines: 1280 vs 768
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 42% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12645 vs 8878
- Around 42% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12645 vs 8878
- Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 444 vs 427
- Around 21% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8160 vs 6738
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1506 MHz vs 795 / 1230 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1708 MHz vs 1455 MHz |
| Pipelines | 1280 vs 768 |
| Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 4 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz vs 8000 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12645 vs 8878 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12645 vs 8878 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 444 vs 427 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 8160 vs 6738 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8878 | 12645 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8878 | 12645 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 | 3654 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 | 3654 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3359 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3359 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 427 | 444 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6738 | 8160 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 33747 | 31098 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 111.55 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1371.266 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.49 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.803 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 509.222 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3677 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
| Code name | N19P-Q1 | GP106B |
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 15 August 2016 |
| Place in performance rating | 375 | 385 |
| Type | Mobile Workstation | Laptop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $237.11 | |
| Price now | $229.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 49.49 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1455 MHz | 1708 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 795 / 1230 MHz | 1506 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 16 nm |
| Pipelines | 768 | 1280 |
| CUDA cores | 1280 | |
| Floating-point performance | 4,275 gflops | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 94 °C | |
| Texture fill rate | 133.6 GTexel / s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 4,400 million | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Laptop size | medium sized | large |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 192 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 8008 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory bandwidth | 192 GB / s | |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | DP 1.43, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI | |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| Multi monitor support | ||
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Ansel | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DSR | ||
| GameStream | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| Multi-Projection | ||
| ShadowWorks | ||
| Surround | ||
| Virtual Reality | ||
| VR Ready | ||

