NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q vs AMD Radeon R9 280X
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q and AMD Radeon R9 280X videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Video outputs and ports, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 46% higher boost clock speed: 1455 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 3 GB
- Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6738 vs 6143
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 vs 8 October 2013 |
| Boost clock speed | 1455 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 28 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 3 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 vs 3700 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 vs 3700 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3357 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6738 vs 6143 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 280X
- 2.7x more pipelines: 2048 vs 768
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9603 vs 8878
- Around 8% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9603 vs 8878
- Around 58% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 675 vs 427
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 2048 vs 768 |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9603 vs 8878 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9603 vs 8878 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 675 vs 427 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 280X
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q | AMD Radeon R9 280X |
|---|---|---|
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8878 | 9603 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8878 | 9603 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 | 3700 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 | 3700 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3357 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 427 | 675 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 6738 | 6143 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 33690 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 89.187 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1434.496 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.656 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 87.459 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 493.57 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2351 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q | AMD Radeon R9 280X | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | N19P-Q1 | Tahiti |
| Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 8 October 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 381 | 379 |
| Type | Mobile Workstation | Desktop |
| Design | AMD Radeon R9 200 Series | |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $299 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1455 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 795 / 1230 MHz | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 768 | 2048 |
| Floating-point performance | 4,096 gflops | |
| Stream Processors | 2048 | |
| Texture fill rate | 128.0 GTexel / s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 4,313 million | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Length | 275 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1 x 6-pin + 1 x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 3 GB |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory bandwidth | 288 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| DDMA audio | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| HD3D | ||
| LiquidVR | ||
| TressFX | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q with others
NVIDIAQuadro T1000 Max-Q vs
ATIRadeon X800 GT
NVIDIAQuadro T1000 Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon R9 280X
NVIDIAQuadro T1000 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 980
NVIDIAQuadro T1000 Max-Q vs
NVIDIATesla M6
NVIDIAQuadro T1000 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAQuadro P3000
NVIDIAQuadro T1000 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650
