NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Video outputs and ports, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 11 month(s) later
- Around 16% higher core clock speed: 795 / 1230 MHz vs 1063 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
- Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 438 vs 402
- Around 11% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 33762 vs 30314
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 27 May 2019 vs 27 June 2017 |
Core clock speed | 795 / 1230 MHz vs 1063 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 16 nm |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 vs 3712 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 vs 3712 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 438 vs 402 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 33762 vs 30314 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q
- Around 2% higher boost clock speed: 1480 MHz vs 1455 MHz
- Around 67% higher pipelines: 1280 vs 768
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 4 GB
- Around 44% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12767 vs 8878
- Around 44% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12767 vs 8878
- Around 16% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7817 vs 6730
Specifications (specs) | |
Boost clock speed | 1480 MHz vs 1455 MHz |
Pipelines | 1280 vs 768 |
Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 4 GB |
Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz vs 8000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12767 vs 8878 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12767 vs 8878 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7817 vs 6730 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q |
---|---|---|
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8878 | 12767 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8878 | 12767 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3716 | 3712 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3716 | 3712 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3359 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 438 | 402 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6730 | 7817 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 33762 | 30314 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 147.271 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1681.162 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.754 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 98.592 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 416.14 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3316 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
Code name | N19P-Q1 | GP106 |
Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 27 June 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 374 | 375 |
Type | Mobile Workstation | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1455 MHz | 1480 MHz |
Core clock speed | 795 / 1230 MHz | 1063 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 16 nm |
Pipelines | 768 | 1280 |
Floating-point performance | 3,789 gflops | |
Texture fill rate | 118.4 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt | |
Transistor count | 4,400 million | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Laptop size | medium sized | large |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 6 GB |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 192 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 8008 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Memory bandwidth | 192.2 GB / s | |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
G-SYNC support | ||
Technologies |
||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
VR Ready |