NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Video outputs and ports, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 8 month(s) later
  • Around 17% higher core clock speed: 795 / 1230 MHz vs 1050 MHz
  • Around 24% higher boost clock speed: 1455 MHz vs 1178 MHz
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
  • 1142.9x more memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 vs 3340
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 vs 3340
  • Around 18% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 33689 vs 28513
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 27 May 2019 vs 19 September 2014
Core clock speed 795 / 1230 MHz vs 1050 MHz
Boost clock speed 1455 MHz vs 1178 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm vs 28 nm
Memory clock speed 8000 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3716 vs 3698
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3716 vs 3698
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3359 vs 3340
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3359 vs 3340
Geekbench - OpenCL 33689 vs 28513

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970

  • 2.2x more pipelines: 1664 vs 768
  • Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 11499 vs 8878
  • Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 11499 vs 8878
  • Around 79% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 766 vs 428
  • Around 43% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9638 vs 6742
Specifications (specs)
Pipelines 1664 vs 768
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 11499 vs 8878
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 11499 vs 8878
PassMark - G2D Mark 766 vs 428
PassMark - G3D Mark 9638 vs 6742

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
8878
11499
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
8878
11499
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3716
3698
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3716
3698
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3359
3340
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3359
3340
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
428
766
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
6742
9638
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
33689
28513
Name NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 8878 11499
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 8878 11499
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3716 3698
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3716 3698
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3359 3340
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3359 3340
PassMark - G2D Mark 428 766
PassMark - G3D Mark 6742 9638
Geekbench - OpenCL 33689 28513
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 105.107
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 1225.96
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 8.76
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 35.714
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 489.884
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 374

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970

Essentials

Architecture Turing Maxwell 2.0
Code name N19P-Q1 GM204
Launch date 27 May 2019 19 September 2014
Place in performance rating 380 377
Type Mobile Workstation Desktop
Launch price (MSRP) $329
Price now $407.76
Value for money (0-100) 28.59

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1455 MHz 1178 MHz
Core clock speed 795 / 1230 MHz 1050 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 768 1664
CUDA cores 1664
Floating-point performance 3,920 gflops
Maximum GPU temperature 98 °C
Texture fill rate 109 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 148 Watt
Transistor count 5,200 million

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Laptop size medium sized
Bus support PCI Express 3.0
Height 4.376" (11.1 cm)
Interface PCIe 3.0 x16
Length 10.5" (26.7 cm)
Recommended system power (PSU) 500 Watt
SLI options 4x
Supplementary power connectors 2x 6-pins

API support

DirectX 12.1 12.0 (12_1)
OpenGL 4.4

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 4 GB
Memory bus width 128 Bit 256 Bit
Memory clock speed 8000 MHz 7.0 GB/s
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5
Memory bandwidth 224 GB / s
Shared memory 0

Video outputs and ports

Audio input for HDMI Internal
Display Connectors 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, Dual Link DVI-I, HDMI 2.0, 3x DisplayPort 1.2
G-SYNC support
HDCP
Maximum VGA resolution 2048x1536
Multi monitor support

Technologies

3D Vision
Adaptive Vertical Sync
CUDA
GameStream
GameWorks
GeForce Experience
GeForce ShadowPlay
GPU Boost
SLI
Surround