NVIDIA Quadro T1000 vs NVIDIA GeForce MX150
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro T1000 and NVIDIA GeForce MX150 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T1000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 49% higher core clock speed: 1395 MHz vs 937 MHz
- Around 40% higher boost clock speed: 1455 MHz vs 1038 MHz
- 1486.6x more texture fill rate: 69.84 GTexel/s vs 46.98 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 768 vs 384
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 60% higher memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 5012 MHz
- 2.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6494 vs 2259
- Around 90% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 404 vs 213
- 3.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 32981 vs 9584
- Around 91% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 87.83 vs 45.905
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9009 vs 4330
- 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9009 vs 4330
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 27 May 2019 vs 17 May 2017 |
Core clock speed | 1395 MHz vs 937 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1455 MHz vs 1038 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 69.84 GTexel/s vs 46.98 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 768 vs 384 |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 14 nm |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz vs 5012 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6494 vs 2259 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 404 vs 213 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 32981 vs 9584 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 87.83 vs 45.905 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9009 vs 4330 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 3710 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9009 vs 4330 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 3710 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3356 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX150
- 5x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 50 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 10 Watt vs 50 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T1000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce MX150
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Quadro T1000 | NVIDIA GeForce MX150 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6494 | 2259 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 404 | 213 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 32981 | 9584 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 87.83 | 45.905 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9009 | 4330 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 3710 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9009 | 4330 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 3710 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3356 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 495.238 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.365 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 38.965 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 145.794 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 999 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 | NVIDIA GeForce MX150 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
Code name | TU117 | GP108 |
Launch date | 27 May 2019 | 17 May 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 400 | 875 |
Type | Mobile Workstation | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1455 MHz | 1038 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1395 MHz | 937 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 69.84 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 4.470 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 2.235 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 768 | 384 |
Pixel fill rate | 46.56 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 69.84 GTexel/s | 46.98 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 10 Watt |
Transistor count | 4700 million | 1,800 million |
Floating-point performance | 1,127 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 1.2 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 128 GB/s | 48.06 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 |