NVIDIA Quadro T1000 vs NVIDIA GeForce MX150

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro T1000 and NVIDIA GeForce MX150 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T1000

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 0 month(s) later
  • Around 49% higher core clock speed: 1395 MHz vs 937 MHz
  • Around 40% higher boost clock speed: 1455 MHz vs 1038 MHz
  • 1486.6x more texture fill rate: 69.84 GTexel/s vs 46.98 GTexel / s
  • 2x more pipelines: 768 vs 384
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
  • Around 60% higher memory clock speed: 8000 MHz vs 5012 MHz
  • 2.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6494 vs 2259
  • Around 90% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 404 vs 213
  • 3.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 32981 vs 9584
  • Around 91% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 87.83 vs 45.905
  • 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9009 vs 4330
  • 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9009 vs 4330
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 27 May 2019 vs 17 May 2017
Core clock speed 1395 MHz vs 937 MHz
Boost clock speed 1455 MHz vs 1038 MHz
Texture fill rate 69.84 GTexel/s vs 46.98 GTexel / s
Pipelines 768 vs 384
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm vs 14 nm
Maximum memory size 4 GB vs 2 GB
Memory clock speed 8000 MHz vs 5012 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 6494 vs 2259
PassMark - G2D Mark 404 vs 213
Geekbench - OpenCL 32981 vs 9584
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 87.83 vs 45.905
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 9009 vs 4330
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3718 vs 3710
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3359 vs 3356
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 9009 vs 4330
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3718 vs 3710
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3359 vs 3356

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX150

  • 5x lower typical power consumption: 10 Watt vs 50 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 10 Watt vs 50 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T1000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce MX150

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
6494
2259
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
404
213
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
32981
9584
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
87.83
45.905
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
9009
4330
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3718
3710
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3359
3356
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
9009
4330
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3718
3710
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3359
3356
Name NVIDIA Quadro T1000 NVIDIA GeForce MX150
PassMark - G3D Mark 6494 2259
PassMark - G2D Mark 404 213
Geekbench - OpenCL 32981 9584
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 87.83 45.905
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 9009 4330
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3718 3710
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3359 3356
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 9009 4330
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3718 3710
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3359 3356
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 495.238
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 2.365
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 38.965
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 145.794
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 999

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA Quadro T1000 NVIDIA GeForce MX150

Essentials

Architecture Turing Pascal
Code name TU117 GP108
Launch date 27 May 2019 17 May 2017
Place in performance rating 400 875
Type Mobile Workstation Laptop

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1455 MHz 1038 MHz
Core clock speed 1395 MHz 937 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 12 nm 14 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance 69.84 GFLOPS
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 4.470 TFLOPS
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 2.235 TFLOPS
Pipelines 768 384
Pixel fill rate 46.56 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 69.84 GTexel/s 46.98 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 50 Watt 10 Watt
Transistor count 4700 million 1,800 million
Floating-point performance 1,127 gflops

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs No outputs

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors None None
Laptop size large

API support

DirectX 12.1 12.0 (12_1)
OpenCL 1.2
OpenGL 4.6 4.6
Shader Model 6.4
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 2 GB
Memory bandwidth 128 GB/s 48.06 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 bit 64 Bit
Memory clock speed 8000 MHz 5012 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5
Shared memory 0