NVIDIA RTX 1000 Mobile Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA RTX 1000 Mobile Ada Generation and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX 1000 Mobile Ada Generation

• Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 0 month(s) later
• 2x more core clock speed: 1485 MHz vs 735 MHz
• Around 85% higher boost clock speed: 2025 MHz vs 1095 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 5 nm vs 12 nm
• 4.3x lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 150 Watt
• Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 557 vs 519
• Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 13351 vs 12935

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q

• Around 15% higher pipelines: 2944 vs 2560
• 6x more memory clock speed: 12000 MHz vs 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective
• Around 19% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 84332 vs 71118

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX 1000 Mobile Ada Generation
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q

PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	557 519
PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	13351 12935
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	71118 84332

Compare specifications (specs)