NVIDIA RTX 1000 Mobile Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA RTX 1000 Mobile Ada Generation and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX 1000 Mobile Ada Generation
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 13% higher core clock speed: 1485 MHz vs 1320 MHz
- Around 14% higher boost clock speed: 2025 MHz vs 1777 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 5 nm vs 8 nm
- 4.9x lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 170 Watt
- Around 7% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 1875 MHz (15 Gbps effective)
Launch date | 26 Feb 2024 vs 12 Jan 2021 |
Core clock speed | 1485 MHz vs 1320 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2025 MHz vs 1777 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm vs 8 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt vs 170 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 1875 MHz (15 Gbps effective) |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060
- Around 23% higher texture fill rate: 199.0 GTexel/s vs 162.0 GTexel/s
- Around 40% higher pipelines: 3584 vs 2560
- 2x more maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 6 GB
- Around 70% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 971 vs 570
- Around 26% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 17107 vs 13591
- Around 24% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 88251 vs 71458
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 199.0 GTexel/s vs 162.0 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 3584 vs 2560 |
Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 6 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 971 vs 570 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 17107 vs 13591 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 88251 vs 71458 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX 1000 Mobile Ada Generation
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA RTX 1000 Mobile Ada Generation | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 570 | 971 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13591 | 17107 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 71458 | 88251 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 299.369 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4021.382 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 28.778 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 188.944 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1152.664 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22495 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22495 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 8785 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA RTX 1000 Mobile Ada Generation | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ampere |
Code name | AD107 | GA106 |
Launch date | 26 Feb 2024 | 12 Jan 2021 |
Place in performance rating | 130 | 132 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $329 | |
Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2025 MHz | 1777 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1485 MHz | 1320 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm | 8 nm |
Pipelines | 2560 | 3584 |
Pixel fill rate | 97.20 GPixel/s | 85.30 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 162.0 GTexel/s | 199.0 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 170 Watt |
Transistor count | 18900 million | 13250 million |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 199.0 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 12.74 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 12.74 TFLOPS | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | IGP | Dual-slot |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 12-pin |
Length | 242 mm (9.5 inches) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 450 Watt | |
Width | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.2 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 12 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 192.0 GB/s | 360 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 96 bit | 192 bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective | 1875 MHz (15 Gbps effective) |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |