NVIDIA RTX 1000 Mobile Ada Generation vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA RTX 1000 Mobile Ada Generation and NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX 1000 Mobile Ada Generation

• Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 6 month(s) later
• Around 3% higher core clock speed: 1485 MHz vs 1440 MHz
• Around 14% higher boost clock speed: 2025 MHz vs 1770 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 5 nm vs 12 nm
• 7.1x lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 250 Watt

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000

• 7x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective
• Around 33% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 795 vs 598
• Around 33% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 18733 vs 14118
• Around 3% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 74179 vs 71731

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX 1000 Mobile Ada Generation
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000

PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	598 795
PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	14118 18733
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	71731 74179

Compare specifications (specs)