NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA RTX A2000
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation and NVIDIA RTX A2000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
- 2.9x more core clock speed: 1635 MHz vs 562 MHz
- Around 76% higher boost clock speed: 2115 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- Around 63% higher texture fill rate: 203.0 GTexel/s vs 124.8 GTexel/s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 5 nm vs 8 nm
- Around 40% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 70 Watt
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 6 GB
- Around 33% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective)
- Around 13% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 15585 vs 13766
- Around 9% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 79625 vs 73255
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1635 MHz vs 562 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2115 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 203.0 GTexel/s vs 124.8 GTexel/s |
Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm vs 8 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 70 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 6 GB |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 15585 vs 13766 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 79625 vs 73255 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX A2000
- Around 8% higher pipelines: 3328 vs 3072
- Around 58% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 989 vs 627
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 3328 vs 3072 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 989 vs 627 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
GPU 2: NVIDIA RTX A2000
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation | NVIDIA RTX A2000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 627 | 989 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 15585 | 13766 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 79625 | 73255 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5944 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation | NVIDIA RTX A2000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ampere |
Code name | AD107 | GA106 |
Place in performance rating | 98 | 96 |
Launch date | 10 Aug 2021 | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $449 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2115 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1635 MHz | 562 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm | 8 nm |
Pipelines | 3072 | 3328 |
Pixel fill rate | 67.68 GPixel/s | 57.60 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 203.0 GTexel/s | 124.8 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 70 Watt |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 124.8 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 7.987 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.987 TFLOPS | |
Transistor count | 13250 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | 4x mini-DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | IGP | Dual-slot |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Length | 167 mm (6.6 inches) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 250 Watt | |
Width | 69 mm (2.7 inches) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.2 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 6 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 256.0 GB/s | 288 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective | 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |