NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
- Around 16% higher core clock speed: 1635 MHz vs 1410 MHz
- Around 27% higher boost clock speed: 2115 MHz vs 1665 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 5 nm vs 8 nm
- 4x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 200 Watt
- Around 14% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective)
Core clock speed | 1635 MHz vs 1410 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2115 MHz vs 1665 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm vs 8 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 200 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
- Around 25% higher texture fill rate: 253.1 GTexel/s vs 203.0 GTexel/s
- Around 58% higher pipelines: 4864 vs 3072
- Around 59% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 996 vs 627
- Around 32% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 20549 vs 15585
- Around 35% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 107110 vs 79627
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 253.1 GTexel/s vs 203.0 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 4864 vs 3072 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 996 vs 627 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 20549 vs 15585 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 107110 vs 79627 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 627 | 996 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 15585 | 20549 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 79627 | 107110 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 311.869 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4657.322 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 35.311 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 125 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1477.456 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27478 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27478 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 11652 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ampere |
Code name | AD107 | GA104 |
Place in performance rating | 98 | 101 |
Launch date | 1 Dec 2020 | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | |
Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 2115 MHz | 1665 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1635 MHz | 1410 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm | 8 nm |
Pipelines | 3072 | 4864 |
Pixel fill rate | 67.68 GPixel/s | 133.2 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 203.0 GTexel/s | 253.1 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 200 Watt |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 253.1 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 16.20 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 16.20 TFLOPS | |
Transistor count | 17400 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | IGP | Dual-slot |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 12-pin |
Length | 242 mm (9.5 inches) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
Width | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.2 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 256.0 GB/s | 448 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 256 bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |