NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation
- Around 21% higher boost clock speed: 1455 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- Around 60% higher pipelines: 3072 vs 1920
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 5 nm vs 12 nm
- 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 80 Watt
| Boost clock speed | 1455 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
| Pipelines | 3072 vs 1920 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm vs 12 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt vs 80 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
- Around 3% higher core clock speed: 960 MHz vs 930 MHz
- 7x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective
| Core clock speed | 960 MHz vs 930 MHz |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
| Name | NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5888 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 540 | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 11353 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 17150 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 17150 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Turing |
| Code name | AD107 | TU106B |
| Place in performance rating | not rated | 197 |
| Launch date | 29 January 2019 | |
| Price now | $349.99 | |
| Type | Laptop | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 62.74 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1455 MHz | 1200 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 930 MHz | 960 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm | 12 nm |
| Pipelines | 3072 | 1920 |
| Pixel fill rate | 46.56 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 139.7 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 80 Watt |
| Transistor count | 10,800 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | IGP | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 256.0 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 192 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective | 14000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation with others
NVIDIARTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs
IntelIris Xe Graphics 96EU (Raptor Lake)
NVIDIARTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 6GB
NVIDIARTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs
NVIDIARTX 2000 Ada Generation
