NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation
- Around 17% higher texture fill rate: 139.7 GTexel/s vs 119.4 GTexel/s
- Around 20% higher pipelines: 3072 vs 2560
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 5 nm vs 8 nm
- 2.1x lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 75 Watt
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 6 GB
- Around 33% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective
| Texture fill rate | 139.7 GTexel/s vs 119.4 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 3072 vs 2560 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm vs 8 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt vs 75 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 6 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
- Around 33% higher core clock speed: 1237 MHz vs 930 MHz
- Around 3% higher boost clock speed: 1492 MHz vs 1455 MHz
| Core clock speed | 1237 MHz vs 930 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1492 MHz vs 1455 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
| Name | NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 803 | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 10623 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 56546 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4842 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ampere |
| Code name | AD107 | GA107 |
| Place in performance rating | not rated | 154 |
| Launch date | 6 Jul 2022 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1455 MHz | 1492 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 930 MHz | 1237 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm | 8 nm |
| Pipelines | 3072 | 2560 |
| Pixel fill rate | 46.56 GPixel/s | 47.74 GPixel/s |
| Texture fill rate | 139.7 GTexel/s | 119.4 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Transistor count | 8700 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | Portable Device Dependent |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | IGP | IGP |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 256.0 GB/s | 144.0 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 96 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective | 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation with others
NVIDIARTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs
IntelIris Xe Graphics 96EU (Raptor Lake)
NVIDIARTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 3050 6GB
NVIDIARTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs
NVIDIARTX 2000 Ada Generation
