NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation
- Around 17% higher texture fill rate: 139.7 GTexel/s vs 119.4 GTexel/s
- Around 20% higher pipelines: 3072 vs 2560
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 5 nm vs 8 nm
- 2.1x lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 75 Watt
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 6 GB
- Around 33% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective
Texture fill rate | 139.7 GTexel/s vs 119.4 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 3072 vs 2560 |
Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm vs 8 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 6 GB |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
- Around 33% higher core clock speed: 1237 MHz vs 930 MHz
- Around 3% higher boost clock speed: 1492 MHz vs 1455 MHz
Core clock speed | 1237 MHz vs 930 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1492 MHz vs 1455 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB
Name | NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 820 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 10693 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 56877 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 4842 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6GB | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ampere |
Code name | AD107 | GA107 |
Place in performance rating | not rated | 151 |
Launch date | 6 Jul 2022 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1455 MHz | 1492 MHz |
Core clock speed | 930 MHz | 1237 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm | 8 nm |
Pipelines | 3072 | 2560 |
Pixel fill rate | 46.56 GPixel/s | 47.74 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 139.7 GTexel/s | 119.4 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt | 75 Watt |
Transistor count | 8700 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | Portable Device Dependent |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | IGP | IGP |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.7 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 6 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 256.0 GB/s | 144.0 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 96 bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective | 1500 MHz, 12 Gbps effective |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |