NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation vs NVIDIA Quadro4 700 XGL

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation and NVIDIA Quadro4 700 XGL videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation

  • 3.4x more core clock speed: 930 MHz vs 275 MHz
  • 63500x more texture fill rate: 139.7 GTexel/s vs 2.2 GTexel / s
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 5 nm vs 150 nm
  • 128x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 64 MB
  • 4.4x more memory clock speed: 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 450 MHz
Core clock speed 930 MHz vs 275 MHz
Texture fill rate 139.7 GTexel/s vs 2.2 GTexel / s
Manufacturing process technology 5 nm vs 150 nm
Maximum memory size 8 GB vs 64 MB
Memory clock speed 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 450 MHz

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation NVIDIA Quadro4 700 XGL

Essentials

Architecture Ada Lovelace Kelvin
Code name AD107 NV25 A2
Place in performance rating not rated not rated
Launch date 19 February 2002
Type Workstation

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1455 MHz
Core clock speed 930 MHz 275 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 5 nm 150 nm
Pipelines 3072
Pixel fill rate 46.56 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate 139.7 GTexel/s 2.2 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 35 Watt
Transistor count 63 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors Portable Device Dependent 2x DVI, 1x S-Video

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Form factor IGP
Interface PCIe 4.0 x16 AGP 4x
Supplementary power connectors None None

API support

DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) 8.1
OpenCL 3.0
OpenGL 4.6 1.3
Shader Model 6.7
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 64 MB
Memory bandwidth 256.0 GB/s 7.2 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 bit 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective 450 MHz
Memory type GDDR6 DDR