NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation and NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation
- Around 20% higher texture fill rate: 244.1 GTexel/s vs 203.0 GTexel/s
- Around 50% higher pipelines: 4608 vs 3072
- Around 21% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 96838 vs 79941
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 244.1 GTexel/s vs 203.0 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 4608 vs 3072 |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 96838 vs 79941 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
- Around 17% higher core clock speed: 1635 MHz vs 1395 MHz
- Around 25% higher boost clock speed: 2115 MHz vs 1695 MHz
- 2.3x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 115 Watt
- 2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1113 vs 548
- Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 17402 vs 15893
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1635 MHz vs 1395 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 2115 MHz vs 1695 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 115 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1113 vs 548 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 17402 vs 15893 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation
GPU 2: NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation | NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 96838 | 79941 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 548 | 1113 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 15893 | 17402 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation | NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ada Lovelace |
Code name | AD106 | AD107 |
Launch date | 21 Mar 2023 | |
Place in performance rating | 103 | 50 |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1695 MHz | 2115 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1395 MHz | 1635 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm | 5 nm |
Pipelines | 4608 | 3072 |
Pixel fill rate | 81.36 GPixel/s | 67.68 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 244.1 GTexel/s | 203.0 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt | 50 Watt |
Transistor count | 22900 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | Portable Device Dependent |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | IGP | IGP |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.7 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 256.0 GB/s | 256.0 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |