NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- Around 2% higher boost clock speed: 1695 MHz vs 1665 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 5 nm vs 8 nm
- Around 74% lower typical power consumption: 115 Watt vs 200 Watt
- Around 14% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective)
Launch date | 21 Mar 2023 vs 1 Dec 2020 |
Boost clock speed | 1695 MHz vs 1665 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm vs 8 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt vs 200 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective vs 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
- Around 1% higher core clock speed: 1410 MHz vs 1395 MHz
- Around 4% higher texture fill rate: 253.1 GTexel/s vs 244.1 GTexel/s
- Around 6% higher pipelines: 4864 vs 4608
- Around 13% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 109075 vs 96207
- Around 76% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 988 vs 562
- Around 28% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 20430 vs 15916
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1410 MHz vs 1395 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 253.1 GTexel/s vs 244.1 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 4864 vs 4608 |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 109075 vs 96207 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 988 vs 562 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 20430 vs 15916 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 96207 | 109075 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 562 | 988 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 15916 | 20430 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 323.141 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4829.953 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 35.311 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 150.943 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1477.456 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 27478 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 27478 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 11688 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA RTX 3000 Ada Generation | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ampere |
Code name | AD106 | GA104 |
Launch date | 21 Mar 2023 | 1 Dec 2020 |
Place in performance rating | 100 | 98 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | |
Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1695 MHz | 1665 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1395 MHz | 1410 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm | 8 nm |
Pipelines | 4608 | 4864 |
Pixel fill rate | 81.36 GPixel/s | 133.2 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 244.1 GTexel/s | 253.1 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt | 200 Watt |
Transistor count | 22900 million | 17400 million |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 253.1 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 16.20 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 16.20 TFLOPS | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | Portable Device Dependent | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | IGP | Dual-slot |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 12-pin |
Length | 242 mm (9.5 inches) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
Width | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.2 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 2.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.7 | 6.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 256.0 GB/s | 448 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 256 bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz, 16 Gbps effective | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |