NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 vs NVIDIA Quadro P4000
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 and NVIDIA Quadro P4000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 93% higher core clock speed: 2325 MHz vs 1202 MHz
- Around 70% higher boost clock speed: 2512 MHz vs 1480 MHz
- 2908.9x more texture fill rate: 482.3 GTexel/s vs 165.8 GTexel / s
- 3.4x more pipelines: 6144 vs 1792
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 5 nm vs 16 nm
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 8 GB
- Around 62% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1286 vs 795
- 2.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 28843 vs 11545
- 4.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 186565 vs 42289
- 4.6x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 5077 vs 1115
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 4 Mar 2025 vs 6 February 2017 |
| Core clock speed | 2325 MHz vs 1202 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2512 MHz vs 1480 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 482.3 GTexel/s vs 165.8 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 6144 vs 1792 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm vs 16 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 8 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1286 vs 795 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 28843 vs 11545 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 186565 vs 42289 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5077 vs 1115 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P4000
- 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 100 Watt vs 250 Watt
- 4.3x more memory clock speed: 7604 MHz vs 1750 MHz, 28 Gbps effective
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt vs 250 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 7604 MHz vs 1750 MHz, 28 Gbps effective |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P4000
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 | NVIDIA Quadro P4000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1286 | 795 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 28843 | 11545 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 186565 | 42289 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5077 | 1115 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 152.325 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1590.392 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 11.365 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 45.977 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 751.626 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 15267 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 15267 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 | NVIDIA Quadro P4000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Blackwell 2.0 | Pascal |
| Code name | GB205 | GP104 |
| Launch date | 4 Mar 2025 | 6 February 2017 |
| Place in performance rating | 20 | 287 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $815 | |
| Price now | $799.99 | |
| Type | Workstation | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 17.17 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 2512 MHz | 1480 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 2325 MHz | 1202 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 5 nm | 16 nm |
| Pipelines | 6144 | 1792 |
| Pixel fill rate | 201.0 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 482.3 GTexel/s | 165.8 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 250 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Transistor count | 31100 million | 7,200 million |
| Floating-point performance | 5,304 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1b | 4x DisplayPort |
| Display Port | 1.4 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | Dual-slot | |
| Height | 40 mm, 1.6 inches | |
| Interface | PCIe 5.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 245 mm, 9.6 inches | 241 mm |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 16-pin | 1x 6-pin |
| Width | 115 mm, 4.5 inches | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.8 | 5.1 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 672.0 GB/s | 192 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 192 bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1750 MHz, 28 Gbps effective | 7604 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR7 | GDDR5 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Stereo | ||
| Mosaic | ||
| nView Display Management | ||
| Optimus | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 with others
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 5070 vs
NVIDIATITAN V CEO Edition
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 5070 vs
AMDRadeon RX 7900 XT
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 5070 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 5070 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 5070 vs
AMDRadeon PRO W7700
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 5070 vs
NVIDIAA800 PCIe 80 GB
