NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA RTX A2000 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX A2000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
- 5x lower typical power consumption: 70 Watt vs 350 Watt
- Around 26% higher memory clock speed: 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) vs 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective
Launch date | 10 Aug 2021 vs 31 May 2021 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 70 Watt vs 350 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) vs 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
- 2.4x more core clock speed: 1365 MHz vs 562 MHz
- Around 39% higher boost clock speed: 1665 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- 4.3x more texture fill rate: 532.8 GTexel/s vs 124.8 GTexel/s
- 3.1x more pipelines: 10240 vs 3328
- 2x more maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 6 GB
- Around 12% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1088 vs 971
- Around 98% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 26935 vs 13585
- 2.9x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 209081 vs 73337
- 3.8x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 5077 vs 1345
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1365 MHz vs 562 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1665 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 532.8 GTexel/s vs 124.8 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 10240 vs 3328 |
Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 6 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1088 vs 971 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 26935 vs 13585 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 209081 vs 73337 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5077 vs 1345 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A2000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA RTX A2000 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G2D Mark | 971 | 1088 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13585 | 26935 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 73337 | 209081 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1345 | 5077 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 485.179 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 661.977 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 60.472 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 129.036 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2441.001 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 34770 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 34770 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA RTX A2000 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Ampere |
Code name | GA106 | GA102 |
Launch date | 10 Aug 2021 | 31 May 2021 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $449 | $1199 |
Place in performance rating | 128 | 60 |
Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | 1665 MHz |
Core clock speed | 562 MHz | 1365 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 8 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 124.8 GFLOPS (1:64) | 532.8 GFLOPS (1:64) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 7.987 TFLOPS (1:1) | 34.10 TFLOPS (1:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.987 TFLOPS | 34.10 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 3328 | 10240 |
Pixel fill rate | 57.60 GPixel/s | 186.5 GPixel/s |
Texture fill rate | 124.8 GTexel/s | 532.8 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 70 Watt | 350 Watt |
Transistor count | 13250 million | 28300 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x mini-DisplayPort | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Dual-slot | Dual-slot |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Length | 167 mm (6.6 inches) | 285 mm, 11.2 inches |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 250 Watt | 750 Watt |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 12-pin |
Width | 69 mm (2.7 inches) | 112 mm, 4.4 inches |
Height | 40 mm, 1.6 inches | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.6 | 6.7 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 12 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 288 GB/s | 912.4 GB/s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 384 bit |
Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) | 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6X |