NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA RTX A2000 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX A2000
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 30% higher pipelines: 3328 vs 2560
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 12 nm
- 3.1x lower typical power consumption: 70 Watt vs 215 Watt
- Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 971 vs 879
- 192.1x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 1345 vs 7
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 10 Aug 2021 vs 2 July 2019 |
| Pipelines | 3328 vs 2560 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 12 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 70 Watt vs 215 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 971 vs 879 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1345 vs 7 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super
- 2.9x more core clock speed: 1605 MHz vs 562 MHz
- Around 48% higher boost clock speed: 1770 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 6 GB
- 9.3x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective)
- Around 34% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 18198 vs 13585
- Around 34% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 98281 vs 73337
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1605 MHz vs 562 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1770 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 6 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 18198 vs 13585 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 98281 vs 73337 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A2000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA RTX A2000 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 971 | 879 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 13585 | 18198 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 73337 | 98281 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1345 | 7 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 293.508 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4045.784 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 29.145 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 158.103 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1438.826 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 25232 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 25232 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA RTX A2000 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
| Code name | GA106 | TU104 |
| Launch date | 10 Aug 2021 | 2 July 2019 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $449 | $499 |
| Place in performance rating | 128 | 129 |
| Type | Desktop | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1200 MHz | 1770 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 562 MHz | 1605 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 124.8 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 7.987 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.987 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 3328 | 2560 |
| Pixel fill rate | 57.60 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 124.8 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 70 Watt | 215 Watt |
| Transistor count | 13250 million | 13.6 B |
| CUDA cores | 2560 | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 88 C | |
| Render output units | 64 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 4x mini-DisplayPort | |
| Display Port | 1.4 | |
| DisplayPort support | ||
| Dual-link DVI support | ||
| G-SYNC support | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Multi monitor support | ||
| Number of simultaneous displays | 4 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | Dual-slot | |
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | |
| Length | 167 mm (6.6 inches) | 10.5” (266.74mm) |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 250 Watt | 650 Watt |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 6 pin + 8 pin |
| Width | 69 mm (2.7 inches) | 2-Slot |
| Height | 4.556” (115.7mm) | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | 6.4 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 288 GB/s | 448 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 256 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) | 14000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Technologies |
||
| Ansel | ||
| HDMI 2.0b | ||
| SLI | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA RTX A2000 with others
NVIDIARTX A2000 vs
NVIDIATesla V100 SXM2 16 GB
NVIDIARTX A2000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Super
NVIDIARTX A2000 vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2080 Super Max-Q
NVIDIARTX A2000 vs
AMDRadeon RX 5600
NVIDIARTX A2000 vs
NVIDIARTX A4000 Mobile
NVIDIARTX A2000 vs
AMDRadeon RX 6700M
