NVIDIA RTX A3000 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA RTX A3000 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA RTX A3000 Mobile

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX A3000 Mobile

Around 22% higher core clock speed: 1080 MHz vs 885 MHz
Around 32% higher boost clock speed: 1560 MHz vs 1185 MHz
Around 78% higher pipelines: 4096 vs 2304
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 12 nm
Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 518 vs 471
Around 8% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12546 vs 11565
Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20429 vs 17328
Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20429 vs 17328
Around 3% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 78491 vs 76247

Specifications (specs)
Core clock speed	1080 MHz vs 885 MHz
Boost clock speed	1560 MHz vs 1185 MHz
Pipelines	4096 vs 2304
Manufacturing process technology	8 nm vs 12 nm
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	518 vs 471
PassMark - G3D Mark	12546 vs 11565
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	20429 vs 17328
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	20429 vs 17328
Geekbench - OpenCL	78491 vs 76247

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q

Around 13% lower typical power consumption: 115 Watt vs 130 Watt
9.3x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective)
2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8912 vs 3710
2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8912 vs 3710
2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8055 vs 3356
2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8055 vs 3356

Specifications (specs)
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	115 Watt vs 130 Watt
Memory clock speed	14000 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective)
Benchmarks
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	8912 vs 3710
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	8912 vs 3710
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	8055 vs 3356
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	8055 vs 3356

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A3000 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

518

471

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

12546

11565

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

20429

17328

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

20429

17328

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3710

8912

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3710

8912

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3356

8055

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3356

8055

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

78491

76247

Name	NVIDIA RTX A3000 Mobile	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
PassMark - G2D Mark	518	471
PassMark - G3D Mark	12546	11565
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	20429	17328
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	20429	17328
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3710	8912
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3710	8912
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3356	8055
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3356	8055
Geekbench - OpenCL	78491	76247
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)		168.08
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)		1935.102
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)		22.794
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)		111.023
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)		1001.496
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		6789

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA RTX A3000 Mobile	NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Essentials
Architecture	Ampere	Turing
Code name	GA104	TU106
Place in performance rating	179	180
Launch date		29 January 2019
Type		Laptop
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1560 MHz	1185 MHz
Core clock speed	1080 MHz	885 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	8 nm	12 nm
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance	199.7 GFLOPS (1:64)
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance	12.78 TFLOPS (1:1)
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance	12.78 TFLOPS
Pipelines	4096	2304
Pixel fill rate	99.84 GPixel/s
Texture fill rate	199.7 GTexel/s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	130 Watt	115 Watt
Transistor count	17400 million	10,800 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	None
API support
DirectX	12.2	12.0
OpenCL	3.0
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Shader Model	6.6
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB
Memory bandwidth	288 GB/s
Memory bus width	192 bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective)	14000 MHz
Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6