NVIDIA RTX A3000 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA RTX A3000 Mobile and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX A3000 Mobile
- Around 22% higher core clock speed: 1080 MHz vs 885 MHz
- Around 32% higher boost clock speed: 1560 MHz vs 1185 MHz
- Around 78% higher pipelines: 4096 vs 2304
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 12 nm
- Around 12% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 526 vs 469
- Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 12647 vs 11546
- Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20429 vs 17328
- Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20429 vs 17328
- Around 4% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 78981 vs 75589
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1080 MHz vs 885 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1560 MHz vs 1185 MHz |
| Pipelines | 4096 vs 2304 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm vs 12 nm |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 526 vs 469 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 12647 vs 11546 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20429 vs 17328 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20429 vs 17328 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 78981 vs 75589 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
- Around 13% lower typical power consumption: 115 Watt vs 130 Watt
- 9.3x more memory clock speed: 14000 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective)
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8912 vs 3710
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8912 vs 3710
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8055 vs 3356
- 2.4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8055 vs 3356
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 115 Watt vs 130 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 14000 MHz vs 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8912 vs 3710 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8912 vs 3710 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8055 vs 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8055 vs 3356 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A3000 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA RTX A3000 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 526 | 469 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 12647 | 11546 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20429 | 17328 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20429 | 17328 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3710 | 8912 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3710 | 8912 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 8055 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 8055 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 78981 | 75589 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 168.08 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1935.102 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 22.794 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 111.023 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1001.496 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 6789 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA RTX A3000 Mobile | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Ampere | Turing |
| Code name | GA104 | TU106 |
| Place in performance rating | 174 | 175 |
| Launch date | 29 January 2019 | |
| Type | Laptop | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1560 MHz | 1185 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1080 MHz | 885 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 8 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 199.7 GFLOPS (1:64) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 12.78 TFLOPS (1:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 12.78 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 4096 | 2304 |
| Pixel fill rate | 99.84 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 199.7 GTexel/s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 130 Watt | 115 Watt |
| Transistor count | 17400 million | 10,800 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.0 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 288 GB/s | |
| Memory bus width | 192 bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective) | 14000 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA RTX A3000 Mobile with others
NVIDIARTX A3000 Mobile vs
NVIDIATesla P100 PCIe 16 GB
NVIDIARTX A3000 Mobile vs
NVIDIATesla P100 PCIe 12 GB
NVIDIARTX A3000 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
NVIDIARTX A3000 Mobile vs
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 Mobile
NVIDIARTX A3000 Mobile vs
NVIDIARTX A1000 Mobile 6GB
NVIDIARTX A3000 Mobile vs
AppleM1 Ultra 48-core
