NVIDIA T400 vs ATI Radeon HD 4200
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA T400 and ATI Radeon HD 4200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA T400
- Videocard is newer: launch date 11 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- 9.6x more pipelines: 384 vs 40
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 55 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 512 MB
- 6.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3346 vs 485
- 6.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3346 vs 485
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 6 May 2021 vs 10 September 2009 |
Pipelines | 384 vs 40 |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 55 nm |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 512 MB |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 vs 485 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 vs 485 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 4200
- Around 19% higher core clock speed: 500 MHz vs 420 MHz
Core clock speed | 500 MHz vs 420 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA T400
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 4200
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA T400 | ATI Radeon HD 4200 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 16965 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 58.805 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 785.059 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.961 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 53.111 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 222.15 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5088 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2173 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 | 485 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5088 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2173 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 | 485 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 372 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 112 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA T400 | ATI Radeon HD 4200 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | RV6xx |
Code name | TU117 | RV620 |
Launch date | 6 May 2021 | 10 September 2009 |
Place in performance rating | 901 | 898 |
Type | Laptop | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1425 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 420 MHz | 500 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 55 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 34.20 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 2.189 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1,094 GFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 384 | 40 |
Pixel fill rate | 22.80 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 34.20 GTexel/s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | |
Transistor count | 4700 million | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 3x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Single-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 200 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 10.1 |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Shader Model | 6.7 (6.4) | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 80.00 GB/s | |
Memory bus width | 64 bit | |
Memory clock speed | 1250 MHz, 10 Gbps effective | |
Memory type | GDDR6 | |
Shared memory | yes | |
Technologies |
||
HDCP support | ||
PCI-E 2.0 |