NVIDIA T400 vs NVIDIA Quadro K4000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA T400 and NVIDIA Quadro K4000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA T400

• Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 2 month(s) later
• 659.7x more texture fill rate: 34.20 GTexel/s vs 51.84 GTexel / s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
• 2.7x lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 80 Watt
• 2.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 16982 vs 6673
• 3.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 58.805 vs 18.462
• Around 83% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 785.059 vs 427.88
• 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.961 vs 1.899
• 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 53.111 vs 23.742
• 3.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 222.15 vs 61.965
• Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5088 vs 3798
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3346 vs 3321
• Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5088 vs 3798
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3346 vs 3321

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K4000

• Around 93% higher core clock speed: 810 MHz vs 420 MHz
• 2x more pipelines: 768 vs 384
• Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 3 GB vs 2 GB
• 4.5x more memory clock speed: 5616 MHz vs 1250 MHz, 10 Gbps effective
• Around 68% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3651 vs 2173
• Around 68% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3651 vs 2173

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA T400
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K4000

Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	16982 6673
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	58.805 18.462
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	785.059 427.88
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3.961 1.899
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	53.111 23.742
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	222.15 61.965
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5088 3798
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2173 3651
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3346 3321
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5088 3798
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2173 3651
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3346 3321

Compare specifications (specs)