NVIDIA T600 vs NVIDIA Quadro P1000
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA T600 and NVIDIA Quadro P1000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA T600
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- 902x more texture fill rate: 53.40 GTexel/s vs 59.2 GTexel / s
- Around 25% higher pipelines: 640 vs 512
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 14 nm
- Around 18% lower typical power consumption: 40 Watt vs 47 Watt
- Around 78% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 27855 vs 15667
- Around 30% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 93.685 vs 71.86
- Around 41% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1176.034 vs 832.248
- Around 50% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 6.06 vs 4.039
- Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 263.201 vs 245.081
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 12 Apr 2021 vs 7 February 2017 |
Texture fill rate | 53.40 GTexel/s vs 59.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 640 vs 512 |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 14 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt vs 47 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 27855 vs 15667 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 93.685 vs 71.86 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1176.034 vs 832.248 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.06 vs 4.039 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 263.201 vs 245.081 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P1000
- Around 72% higher core clock speed: 1266 MHz vs 735 MHz
- Around 11% higher boost clock speed: 1480 MHz vs 1335 MHz
- 4x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective)
- Around 18% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 65.117 vs 55.328
Specifications (specs) | |
Core clock speed | 1266 MHz vs 735 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1480 MHz vs 1335 MHz |
Memory clock speed | 5012 MHz vs 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective) |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 65.117 vs 55.328 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA T600
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P1000
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA T600 | NVIDIA Quadro P1000 |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 27855 | 15667 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 93.685 | 71.86 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1176.034 | 832.248 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.06 | 4.039 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 55.328 | 65.117 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 263.201 | 245.081 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4500 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 590 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 6796 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3702 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3348 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 6796 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3702 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3348 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1591 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA T600 | NVIDIA Quadro P1000 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
Code name | TU117 | GP107 |
Launch date | 12 Apr 2021 | 7 February 2017 |
Place in performance rating | 756 | 517 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $375 | |
Price now | $319.99 | |
Type | Workstation | |
Value for money (0-100) | 15.53 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1335 MHz | 1480 MHz |
Core clock speed | 735 MHz | 1266 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 53.40 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 3.418 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1.709 TFLOPS | |
Pipelines | 640 | 512 |
Pixel fill rate | 42.72 GPixel/s | |
Texture fill rate | 53.40 GTexel/s | 59.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt | 47 Watt |
Transistor count | 4700 million | 3,300 million |
Floating-point performance | 1,894 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 4x mini-DisplayPort | 4x mini-DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Form factor | Single-slot | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 200 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Length | 145 mm | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.6 | |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 160 GB/s | 80.19 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective) | 5012 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |