NVIDIA T600 vs NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA T600 and NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA T600
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- 325.6x more texture fill rate: 53.40 GTexel/s vs 164.0 GTexel / s
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
- 5.9x lower typical power consumption: 40 Watt vs 235 Watt
- Around 67% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 27767 vs 16581
- Around 89% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 93.685 vs 49.455
- Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 6.06 vs 5.836
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 12 Apr 2021 vs 12 November 2012 |
| Core clock speed | 735 MHz vs 732 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 53.40 GTexel/s vs 164.0 GTexel / s |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt vs 235 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 27767 vs 16581 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 93.685 vs 49.455 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.06 vs 5.836 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm
- 4.2x more pipelines: 2688 vs 640
- Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 4 GB
- 4.2x more memory clock speed: 5200 MHz vs 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective)
- Around 42% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1666.354 vs 1176.034
- Around 67% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 92.472 vs 55.328
- Around 5% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 275.229 vs 263.201
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 2688 vs 640 |
| Maximum memory size | 6 GB vs 4 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 5200 MHz vs 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1666.354 vs 1176.034 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 92.472 vs 55.328 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 275.229 vs 263.201 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA T600
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA T600 | NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 27767 | 16581 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 93.685 | 49.455 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1176.034 | 1666.354 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.06 | 5.836 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 55.328 | 92.472 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 263.201 | 275.229 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2918 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 172 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1032 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 7038 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1032 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 7038 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA T600 | NVIDIA Tesla K20Xm | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Kepler |
| Code name | TU117 | GK110 |
| Launch date | 12 Apr 2021 | 12 November 2012 |
| Place in performance rating | 811 | 808 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $7,699 | |
| Type | Workstation | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1335 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 735 MHz | 732 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 53.40 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 3.418 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 1.709 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 640 | 2688 |
| Pixel fill rate | 42.72 GPixel/s | |
| Texture fill rate | 53.40 GTexel/s | 164.0 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 40 Watt | 235 Watt |
| Transistor count | 4700 million | 7,080 million |
| Floating-point performance | 3,935 gflops | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 4x mini-DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Form factor | Single-slot | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 200 Watt | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Length | 267 mm | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 160 GB/s | 249.6 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective) | 5200 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA T600 with others
NVIDIAT600 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 470
NVIDIAT600 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7450M
NVIDIAT600 vs
NVIDIATesla K20Xm
NVIDIAT600 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 810A
NVIDIAT600 vs
IntelIris Plus Graphics 645
NVIDIAT600 vs
AMDRadeon Vega 9
