NVIDIA Tesla C1060 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTX
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla C1060 and NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTX videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla C1060
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 5 month(s) later
- Around 22% higher core clock speed: 610 MHz vs 500 MHz
- 2x more texture fill rate: 48.8 GTexel / s vs 24 GTexel / s
- 2.5x more pipelines: 240 vs 96
- 2.6x better floating-point performance: 622.1 gflops vs 240 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 55 nm vs 65 nm
- 8x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 512 MB
- 2x more memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 800 MHz
Launch date | 9 April 2009 vs 1 November 2007 |
Core clock speed | 610 MHz vs 500 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 48.8 GTexel / s vs 24 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 240 vs 96 |
Floating-point performance | 622.1 gflops vs 240 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm vs 65 nm |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz vs 800 MHz |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTX
- 2.9x lower typical power consumption: 65 Watt vs 188 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 65 Watt vs 188 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla C1060
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTX
Name | NVIDIA Tesla C1060 | NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTX |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 18689 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 462 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 175 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2485 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2485 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Tesla C1060 | NVIDIA GeForce 8800M GTX | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Tesla |
Code name | GT200B | G92 |
Launch date | 9 April 2009 | 1 November 2007 |
Place in performance rating | 1149 | 1150 |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 610 MHz | 500 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 622.1 gflops | 240 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 240 | 96 |
Texture fill rate | 48.8 GTexel / s | 24 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 188 Watt | 65 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,400 million | 754 million |
CUDA cores | 96 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-HE |
Length | 267 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | None |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 102.4 GB / s | 51.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 512 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 800 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
Gigathread technology | ||
HDCP-capable | ||
HDR (High Dynamic-Range Lighting) | ||
PCI-E 16x | ||
PowerMizer 7.0 | ||
SLI |