NVIDIA Tesla C1060 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9300M G
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla C1060 and NVIDIA GeForce 9300M G videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla C1060
- Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 2 month(s) later
- 15.3x more texture fill rate: 48.8 GTexel / s vs 3.2 GTexel / s
- 15x more pipelines: 240 vs 16
- 24.3x better floating-point performance: 622.1 gflops vs 25.6 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 55 nm vs 80 nm
- 16x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 256 MB
- 2.7x more memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 600 MHz
Launch date | 9 April 2009 vs 1 February 2008 |
Texture fill rate | 48.8 GTexel / s vs 3.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 240 vs 16 |
Floating-point performance | 622.1 gflops vs 25.6 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm vs 80 nm |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 256 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz vs 600 MHz |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9300M G
- Around 31% higher core clock speed: 800 MHz vs 610 MHz
- 14.5x lower typical power consumption: 13 Watt vs 188 Watt
Core clock speed | 800 MHz vs 610 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 13 Watt vs 188 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla C1060
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9300M G
Name | NVIDIA Tesla C1060 | NVIDIA GeForce 9300M G |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 18689 | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 85 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 242 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 778 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 778 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Tesla C1060 | NVIDIA GeForce 9300M G | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Tesla |
Code name | GT200B | G86 |
Launch date | 9 April 2009 | 1 February 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 1173 | 1174 |
Type | Workstation | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 610 MHz | 800 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 622.1 gflops | 25.6 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 80 nm |
Pipelines | 240 | 16 |
Texture fill rate | 48.8 GTexel / s | 3.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 188 Watt | 13 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,400 million | 210 million |
CUDA cores | 16 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Length | 267 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.0 | 10.0 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 256 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 102.4 GB / s | 9.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 512 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | 600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR2 / GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
Gigathread technology | ||
HDCP-capable | ||
HDR (High Dynamic-Range Lighting) | ||
PCI-E 16x | ||
PowerMizer 7.0 |