NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560M vs NVIDIA Tesla C1060

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560M and NVIDIA Tesla C1060 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560M

NVIDIA Tesla C1060

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560M

Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 1 month(s) later
Around 27% higher core clock speed: 775 MHz vs 610 MHz
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 55 nm
2.5x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 188 Watt

Launch date	30 May 2011 vs 9 April 2009
Core clock speed	775 MHz vs 610 MHz
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm vs 55 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	75 Watt vs 188 Watt

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla C1060

Around 97% higher texture fill rate: 48.8 GTexel / s vs 24.8 billion / sec
Around 25% higher pipelines: 240 vs 192
Around 5% better floating-point performance: 622.1 gflops vs 595.2 gflops
2.7x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1536 MB
Around 28% higher memory clock speed: 1600 MHz vs 1250 MHz
3.8x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 18689 vs 4924

Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate	48.8 GTexel / s vs 24.8 billion / sec
Pipelines	240 vs 192
Floating-point performance	622.1 gflops vs 595.2 gflops
Maximum memory size	4 GB vs 1536 MB
Memory clock speed	1600 MHz vs 1250 MHz
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	18689 vs 4924

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla C1060

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

4924

18689

Name	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560M	NVIDIA Tesla C1060
PassMark - G3D Mark	1261
PassMark - G2D Mark	261
Geekbench - OpenCL	4924	18689
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	13.598
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	404.618
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	1.227
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	25.333
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	44.123
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1857
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3275
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3341
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1857
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3275
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3341
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	0

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560M	NVIDIA Tesla C1060
Essentials
Architecture	Fermi 2.0	Tesla 2.0
Code name	GF116	GT200B
Launch date	30 May 2011	9 April 2009
Place in performance rating	1171	1173
Type	Laptop	Workstation
Technical info
Core clock speed	775 MHz	610 MHz
CUDA cores	192
Floating-point performance	595.2 gflops	622.1 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	55 nm
Pipelines	192	240
Texture fill rate	24.8 billion / sec	48.8 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	75 Watt	188 Watt
Transistor count	1,170 million	1,400 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Bus support	PCI-E 2.0
Interface	MXM-B (3.0)	PCIe 2.0 x16
Laptop size	large
SLI options	2-way
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Length		267 mm
API support
DirectX	12 API	10.0
OpenCL	1.1
OpenGL	4.5	3.3
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	1536 MB	4 GB
Memory clock speed	1250 MHz	1600 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR3
Shared memory	0
Memory bandwidth		102.4 GB / s
Memory bus width		512 Bit
Technologies
3D Blu-Ray
3D Gaming
3D Vision
CUDA
DirectX 11	DirectX 11
Optimus