NVIDIA Tesla K40c vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla K40c and NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla K40c
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 30% higher core clock speed: 745 MHz vs 575 MHz
- 13x more texture fill rate: 178.8 GTexel / s vs 13.8 GTexel / s
- 120x more pipelines: 2880 vs 24
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 90 nm
- 24x more maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 512 MB
- 5x more memory clock speed: 6008 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- Around 5% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 325 vs 309
- 14.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4495 vs 306
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 8 October 2013 vs 1 March 2007 |
Core clock speed | 745 MHz vs 575 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 178.8 GTexel / s vs 13.8 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2880 vs 24 |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 90 nm |
Maximum memory size | 12 GB vs 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 325 vs 309 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4495 vs 306 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M
- 5.4x lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 245 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt vs 245 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla K40c
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA Tesla K40c | NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M |
---|---|---|
Geekbench - OpenCL | 17468 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 61.566 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1779.043 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.463 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 103.169 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 308.261 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 325 | 309 |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4495 | 306 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA Tesla K40c | NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | Curie |
Code name | GK110B | G71 |
Launch date | 8 October 2013 | 1 March 2007 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $7,699 | $99.99 |
Place in performance rating | 513 | 511 |
Type | Workstation | Mobile workstation |
Price now | $99.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 3.97 | |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 745 MHz | 575 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 4,291 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 90 nm |
Pipelines | 2880 | 24 |
Texture fill rate | 178.8 GTexel / s | 13.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 245 Watt | 45 Watt |
Transistor count | 7,080 million | 278 million |
Boost clock speed | 575 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-III |
Length | 267 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 9.0c |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 12 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 288.4 GB / s | 38.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 700 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | 256 |
Shared memory | 0 |