NVIDIA GeForce MX450 vs NVIDIA Tesla K40c

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce MX450 and NVIDIA Tesla K40c videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce MX450

• Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 9 month(s) later
• Around 87% higher core clock speed: 1395 MHz vs 745 MHz
• 563.8x more texture fill rate: 100.8 GTexel/s vs 178.8 GTexel / s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 28 nm
• 4.9x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 245 Watt
• Around 66% higher memory clock speed: 10002 MHz vs 6008 MHz
• Around 67% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 29180 vs 17468

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla K40c

• 3.2x more pipelines: 2880 vs 896
• 6x more maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 2 GB
• Around 20% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4495 vs 3732
• Around 7% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 325 vs 304

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX450
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla K40c

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	3732 4495
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	304 325
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	29180 17468

Compare specifications (specs)