NVIDIA Tesla K80m vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla K80m and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA Tesla K80m

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla K80m

Videocard is newer: launch date 8 month(s) later
50.3x more texture fill rate: 2x 182.2 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 43.4 GTexel / s
7.8x more pipelines: 2x 2496 vs 640
6.3x better floating-point performance: 2x 4,373 gflops vs 1,389 gflops
12x more maximum memory size: 2x 12 GB vs 2 GB
1002.4x more memory clock speed: 5012 MHz vs 5.4 GB/s
Around 60% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 18475 vs 11512
Around 48% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 62.651 vs 42.463
2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1653.567 vs 642.715
3.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 86.984 vs 26.532
Around 94% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 258.278 vs 133.458
2.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 6.882 vs 2.933

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	17 November 2014 vs 18 February 2014
Texture fill rate	2x 182.2 GTexel / s billion / sec vs 43.4 GTexel / s
Pipelines	2x 2496 vs 640
Floating-point performance	2x 4,373 gflops vs 1,389 gflops
Maximum memory size	2x 12 GB vs 2 GB
Memory clock speed	5012 MHz vs 5.4 GB/s
Benchmarks
Geekbench - OpenCL	18475 vs 11512
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	62.651 vs 42.463
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1653.567 vs 642.715
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	86.984 vs 26.532
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	258.278 vs 133.458
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	6.882 vs 2.933

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Around 81% higher core clock speed: 1020 MHz vs 562 MHz
Around 24% higher boost clock speed: 1085 MHz vs 876 MHz
5x lower typical power consumption: 60 Watt vs 300 Watt

Core clock speed	1020 MHz vs 562 MHz
Boost clock speed	1085 MHz vs 876 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	60 Watt vs 300 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla K80m
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

18475

11512

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

62.651

42.463

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1653.567

642.715

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

86.984

26.532

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

258.278

133.458

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

6.882

2.933

Name	NVIDIA Tesla K80m	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Geekbench - OpenCL	18475	11512
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	62.651	42.463
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	1653.567	642.715
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	86.984	26.532
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	258.278	133.458
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	6.882	2.933
PassMark - G3D Mark		3898
PassMark - G2D Mark		517
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)		4843
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)		3683
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)		3329
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)		4843
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)		3683
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)		3329
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score		116

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Tesla K80m	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Essentials
Architecture	Kepler 2.0	Maxwell
Code name	GK210	GM107
Launch date	17 November 2014	18 February 2014
Place in performance rating	725	726
Type	Workstation	Desktop
Launch price (MSRP)		$149
Price now		$299.01
Value for money (0-100)		15.02
Technical info
Boost clock speed	876 MHz	1085 MHz
Core clock speed	562 MHz	1020 MHz
Floating-point performance	2x 4,373 gflops	1,389 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	2x 2496	640
Texture fill rate	2x 182.2 GTexel / s billion / sec	43.4 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	300 Watt	60 Watt
Transistor count	7,080 million	1,870 million
CUDA cores		640
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini...
Audio input for HDMI		Internal
G-SYNC support
HDCP
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution		2048x1536
Multi monitor support
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	267 mm	5.7" (14.5 cm)
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin	None
Bus support		PCI Express 3.0
Height		4.376" (11.1 cm)
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_1)	12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.6	4.4
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	2x 12 GB	2 GB
Memory bandwidth	2x 240.6 GB / s	86.4 GB / s
Memory bus width	2x 384 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	5012 MHz	5.4 GB/s
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Shared memory		0
Technologies
3D Gaming
3D Vision
3D Vision Live
Adaptive VSync
Blu Ray 3D
CUDA
FXAA
GeForce Experience
GPU Boost
TXAA